Re: Proposed: next-generation alignment and adjustment control

2024-06-24 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Bjarni, I urge you to read my earlier messages in this thread carefully. They address every point you're making. At 2024-06-25T00:05:40+, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: > The bug is shown in the example by > > .ad l > mno pqr\p > .na > stu vwx\p > .ad > yza bcd\p > > Result is (links,

Re: Proposed: next-generation alignment and adjustment control

2024-06-24 Thread Bjarni Ingi Gislason
The bug is shown in the example by .ad l mno pqr\p .na stu vwx\p .ad yza bcd\p Result is (links, no adjustment, unchanged=previous) yza bcd instead of yza bcd With my patch it is yza bcd with other parts unchanged from upstream. All the different implementations (also "plan9

Re: Documenting a set of functions with -man

2024-06-24 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Anton, ...returning to this after a digression on alignment/adjustment... At 2024-06-18T02:01:24+0300, Anton Shepelev wrote: > G. Branden Robinson: > In my sources, I tend to format the declarations of my > functions in similar manner, e.g.: > >void sort >(void * data, /* pointer

Re: Proposed: next-generation alignment and adjustment control

2024-06-24 Thread G. Branden Robinson
[self-follow-up] At 2024-06-23T19:13:27-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > Decisions still to be made: [...] > 3. Whether to alter the behavior of the `ad` request, as the attached > patch contemplates. Doing so accommodates man page authors' DWIM > intentions, at some risk to altering t