On 2/5/24, hoh...@posteo.de wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 01:13:45 -0600
> Dave Kemper wrote:
>
>> In the message to which I was replying, you were speaking of the
>> sequence of bytes that were part of the input to gpic; in this realm,
>> ECMA-48 is irrelevant. And in any case, the 0x84 byte in q
Quoth G. Branden Robinson:
ACK. I've gotten a bit sidetracked learning more about terminfo and
ncurses...and a dreaded, predictable thing happened.
I found the existing ncurses documentation frustrating and started
rewriting it. (This is how groff got stuck with me.)
https://lists.gnu.org/arc
On Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:19:41 -0500,
Deri wrote:
> Have you tried running configure with the flag:-
>
> --with-urw-fonts-dir=/usr/share/fonts/urw-base35
As was mentioned in my original message to the list, I did use that
option to successfully configure groff which lead to a successful
build and
On Monday, 5 February 2024 16:51:29 GMT T. Kurt Bond wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 04:52:31 -0500,
>
> "G. Branden Robinson" wrote:
> > Do any of the following directories exist on Fedora 39 and contain .afm
> > files alongside the fonts proper?
> >
> > _list_paths="\
> >
> > /usr/share
On 2/5/24, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> As far as I know, groff has never extended AT&T troff syntax in _this_
> respect.
>
> The argument count to requests (unlike macros) is seemingly sacrosanct.
Groff extended the .ss request by adding an optional second parameter
where AT&T's took only one.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 04:52:31 -0500,
"G. Branden Robinson" wrote:
> Do any of the following directories exist on Fedora 39 and contain .afm
> files alongside the fonts proper?
>
> _list_paths="\
> /usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/ \
> /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/ \
> /usr/share/font
At 2024-01-23T22:13:26-0600, Dave Kemper wrote:
> On 1/23/24, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > At 2024-01-23T20:52:34-0600, Dave Kemper wrote:
> >> However, .bp arguably shouldn't have been affected by the change,
> >> since it probably wasn't subject to the same historical ambiguity.
> >
> > I agre
At 2024-01-24T19:39:25-0600, Dave Kemper wrote:
> On 1/22/24, Oliver Corff wrote:
> > yes, I did have a look at that section of the groff documentation,
> > and I must confess that I read the text as non-exhaustive, meaning
> > the five specific ligatures are built-in, with the option to
> > incre
