On Tue, 13 Jun 2023, Deri wrote:
Here's my 1.22.4 version with Tadziu's fix. The pdf shows the difference
between using my SS font, using Tadziu's fix to pdf.tmac and using grops
and the type 3 SS font.
That solves my issues.
Thanks Deri
- Damian
Pacific Engineering Systems International .
At 2023-06-14T00:53:42+0100, Deri wrote:
> This is using a real font, deleted pdf:SS.
Looks great! It's not led astray by the superscripts or anything.
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Forwarding another mail of Doug's that I think was sent to TUHS by
mistake.
At 2023-06-13T21:58:51-0400, Douglas McIlroy wrote:
> There may be a simple generic way to correct pic's habit of accepting
> any set of object modifiers on any object, but obeying only a
> compatible subset.
>
> Pic alre
On Wednesday, 14 June 2023 00:33:16 BST G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2023-06-13T17:15:56-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I don't think we're _quite_ there, though; we need to contrive italic
> > corrections too, which seems like it would be harder without a real
> > font,[1] since they vary
At 2023-06-13T18:33:16-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I undertook to do this. Lacking experience as a real typographer, I
> did things by eyeballing them with sample inputs that seemed likely
> provocative of glyph collisions in mathematical typesetting, and by
> limiting myself to adjustments
At 2023-06-13T17:15:56-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I don't think we're _quite_ there, though; we need to contrive italic
> corrections too, which seems like it would be harder without a real
> font,[1] since they vary by glyph. See the attachments.
[...]
> [1] Well, maybe not. We can hand
At 2023-06-13T17:15:56-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> See the attachments.
Sigh.
.sp
.EQ
f ( pi ) + 2 pi int sin ( omega t ) dt + e sup { i pi sup { rho + 1 } }
.EN
.sp
.EQ
f ( pi ) + 2 pi int sin ( omega t ) dt + e sup { i pi sup { rho + 1 } }
.EN
.br
.ft I
A\[*p]\[*r]\[*w]Z
.sp
A\s'16'\[*p]\
Hi Tadziu!
At 2023-06-13T17:11:50+0200, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
> > I think the likeliest site to fix PDF output is the `pdf:SS`
> > macro in pdf.tmac.
>
> You are right.
>
> This works:
>
> .de pdf:SS
> .char \\$1 \s'n[.ps]u*89u/100u'\S'15'\\$1\S'0'\s'0'
> ..
> .pdf:SS \[*a]
> .pd
On Tuesday, 13 June 2023 21:46:59 BST Damian McGuckin wrote:
> Could I impose and ask for a patch to the 1.22.4 .tmac file please?
>
> I would like to test that against my updated EQN User Guide.
>
> Thanks heaps - Damian
Hi Damian,
Here's my 1.22.4 version with Tadziu's fix. The pdf shows the
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
I think the likeliest site to fix PDF output is the `pdf:SS`
macro in pdf.tmac.
You are right.
This works:
.de pdf:SS
.char \\$1 \s'n[.ps]u*89u/100u'\S'15'\\$1\S'0'\s'0'
..
.pdf:SS \[*a]
.pdf:SS \[*b]
(etc.)
Could I impose and ask for a
Hi Bjarni,
At 2023-06-13T16:53:50+, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> How does \D't ...' influence the height of the text baseline as it
> is just changing the "graphic pen" and moving it horizontally (in
> the air) to its next position?
I don't think the \D't' command has any impact on ver
On Tuesday, 13 June 2023 16:11:50 BST Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
> > I think the likeliest site to fix PDF output is the `pdf:SS`
> > macro in pdf.tmac.
>
> You are right.
>
> This works:
>
> .de pdf:SS
> .char \\$1 \s'n[.ps]u*89u/100u'\S'15'\\$1\S'0'\s'0'
> ..
> .pdf:SS \[*a]
> .pdf:S
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 06:19:39PM -0400, Steve Izma wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 03:07:07PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Subject: drawing commands in groff(7) (was: undiagnosed pic error)
>
> > \D't n'
> > Set line thickness of geometric objects to to n basic units. A
>
> I think the likeliest site to fix PDF output is the `pdf:SS`
> macro in pdf.tmac.
You are right.
This works:
.de pdf:SS
.char \\$1 \s'n[.ps]u*89u/100u'\S'15'\\$1\S'0'\s'0'
..
.pdf:SS \[*a]
.pdf:SS \[*b]
(etc.)
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 02:29:04PM -0400, Steve Izma wrote:
> Subject: Re: drawing commands have no impact on diversion height
>
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 01:35:22PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Subject: drawing commands have no impact on diversion height
> >
> > I find myself offended b
15 matches
Mail list logo
