It seems there is a package
urw-base35-fonts-legacy
which installs the files in question in
/usr/share/X11/fonts/urw-fonts
I will try and install them, symbolically
/usr/share/fonts/default/Type1
to that directory and go through the whole exercise again.
It would b
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 10:16:30PM +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
>[...]
>
> The fix is to change the '.' line before the '\\*(...' lines to,
> for example,
>
> .do nop\" DO NOT REMOVE the line, see an earlier comment
>
> N.B.
>
> The comment about the bug should also be in the general
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 04:07:06AM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2022-07-10T02:04:10+, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> > A test case:
> >
> > zcat /usr/share/man/man1/test.1.gz | test-nroff -mandoc -C -z
> >
> > produces a lot of warnings, while '-man' does not.
> >
>
> I can't r
Why are tmac/tty-char.tmac and tmac/tty.tmac separate files? They
both seem to serve essentially the same purpose: providing fallback
character sequences for characters that may not exist in the terminal
environment's encoding (especially the limited sets available to ASCII
and Latin-1).
But they
I grabbed the fonts from CentOS 7.6 in
/usr/share/fonts/default/Type1
and copied them onto my CentOS 7.9 system.
I then reran 'configure' in 1.22.4 with
--with-urw-fonts-dir=/usr/share/fonts/default/Type1
as an argument, and reinstalled things.
I recreated the file
At 2022-07-10T02:04:10+, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> A test case:
>
> zcat /usr/share/man/man1/test.1.gz | test-nroff -mandoc -C -z
>
> produces a lot of warnings, while '-man' does not.
>
I can't reproduce this.
$ ./build/test-groff -mandoc -C -Tutf8
.TH foo 1 2022-07-10 "bogus
[dropped CCs to Robert and bug-groff]
At 2022-07-08T14:18:38-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I now see diagnostics from afmtodit that I've never observed before,
> though I think other people have reported them. I suspect they are
> freshly exposed bugs in our "font/devps/generate/textmap" fil
