On Monday, 6 June 2022 19:08:23 BST Deri wrote:
> As I suggested it would be helpful if you are able to run gs -h on a windows
> box under cygwin and natively, the output would help us.
I have now managed to run gs -h under a VM of windows 10 with latest
ghostscript, and you are
correct that it
On 6/10/22 14:16, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
For groff, at least, the fundamental change is straightforward. I can
made the troff(1) command do it with a 1-line patch.
diff --git a/src/roff/troff/env.cpp b/src/roff/troff/env.cpp
index d6a9e982d..d3f80a205 100644
--- a/src/roff/troff/env.cpp
+++
Hi Ingo!
At 2022-06-06T09:18:01+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> So since .B uses .itc, and that appears to match Heirloom behaviour
> according to your research, it might be unwise to change that now.
I've changed it anyway. I now regard Heirloom's man(7) as buggy in this
respect. If I run Heirloo
Hi Branden,
> 4. Marking empty tbl(1) entries.
>
> There are other applications, but those are the ones I can think of
> immediately.
Specifying the point of alignment for tbl(1)'s numeric columns.
$ tbl | nroff | grep .
.TS
n.
\(Po
\(Po\&
1
23
456
7890
.T
At 2022-06-06T21:14:01+1000, John Gardner wrote:
> I haven't read the entirety of this thread, but why hasn't the name
> *"command suppressor"* or *"control suppressor"* been considered?
> AFAIK, \& has no other uses outside of an input line (diversions
> notwithstanding), so naming it *"input brea
Hi Alex!
At 2022-06-10T11:52:30+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> As far as I know, there's currently no tool that warns on "foo. bar"
> in filled test. Not `mandoc -Tlint`, and not `groff -ww`, and not
> `groff -rCHECKSTYLE=999`. I know that CHECKSTYLE is not designed in a
> way that could catch
Hi Alejandro,
> The tool could have a secondary warning, not so important,
> for "foo, bar".
What warning do you think this needs?
--
Cheers, Ralph.
Hi, Ingo and Branden!
As far as I know, there's currently no tool that warns on "foo. bar" in
filled test. Not `mandoc -Tlint`, and not `groff -ww`, and not `groff
-rCHECKSTYLE=999`. I know that CHECKSTYLE is not designed in a way that
could catch this easily, but maybe -ww or -Tlint could.
