At 2022-05-21T22:41:58-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Yes, I think so. As I understand it, the HTML devices ("html" and
> "xhtml") _are_ the problem in this regard. Or they once were. A quick
> experiment reveals that `.PD 0` and `.PD` work fine at least for simple
> cases in HTML output. S
Hi, Alex!
At 2022-05-21T23:58:57+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> On 5/21/22 17:21, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > In groff(7), I'm piloting "begin list" and "end list" macros to
> > provide a path out of the elaborate page-private macro system that
> > the page has used for many years. They are
Hi Branden,
On 5/21/22 17:21, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
In groff(7), I'm piloting "begin list" and "end list" macros to provide
a path out of the elaborate page-private macro system that the page has
used for many years. They are even simpler than TQ.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.g
Hi Alex!
At 2022-05-21T16:46:51+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> For the following existing usage of the deprecated .PD 0 I tried to
> use .TQ in a way that I'm not sure if it's correct by just reading
> groff_man(7):
>
> [
> .PD 0
> .TP
> tag1
> Some text here.
> .TP
> tag2
> Some more text.
> .
On 5/21/22 16:46, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
I (succesfully) tried the following:
[
.TP
tag1
Some text here.
.TQ
I missed here "tag2"
Some more text.
]
--
Alejandro Colomar
Linux man-pages comaintainer; https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/
Hi, Branden!
For the following existing usage of the deprecated .PD 0
I tried to use .TQ in a way that I'm not sure if it's correct by just
reading groff_man(7):
[
.PD 0
.TP
tag1
Some text here.
.TP
tag2
Some more text.
.PD
]
The above produces:
[
tag1 Some text here.
tag2 Some more text
