Re: style: .MR

2022-02-10 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi, Humm wrote: > > I think we should either use .MR without a number, or use .I/.B, > > probably .I/.B, since there's no manual page reference going on. > > From there, man(7) tradition seems to prescribe .B, and groff(1) > > style seems to prescribe .I... > > I think -man tradition quite clearly

Re: style: .MR

2022-02-10 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Humm, > Personally, I’d much rather see a KWIC permuted index of the NAME > sections. (At least some of mentioned Programmer’s Manuals have that > too.) I agree. I used to read the troff-typeset man pages which accompanied Sun servers as a row of heavy folders and the permuted index was an e