Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark

2020-02-15 Thread Deri
On Saturday, 15 February 2020 23:45:16 GMT Jeff Conrad wrote: > > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2020 8:01 AM > > > > It's non-portable because that other person might use a man(7) formatter > > that doesn't support .am or .pdfbookmark, or not in the same way as groff. > > > > > What's far more non

RE: man Macro Package and pdfmark

2020-02-15 Thread Jeff Conrad
> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2020 8:01 AM > > It's non-portable because that other person might use a man(7) formatter > that doesn't support .am or .pdfbookmark, or not in the same way as groff. > > What's far more nonstandard ... > Yes, that is very evil. Never try to be clever in manual pa

mail groff@gnu.org

2020-02-15 Thread Doug McIlroy
Subject: " Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark" > Just don't do that. Never use low-level roff stuff in manual pages, > don't even think about it. This makes your manual pages non-portable. I can understand why playing with private aspects of the macro package may be unportable. And it would be po

Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark

2020-02-15 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Jeff, Jeff Conrad wrote on Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 08:14:15PM -0800: > Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> Jeff Conrad wrote: >>> .am SH >>> .pdfbookmark 1 "\&\\$*" >>> .. >>> .am SS >>> .pdfbookmark 2 "\&\\$*" >>> .. >> Just don't do that. Never use low-level roff stuff in manual pages, >> don't even thin