> Even better - on OpenBSD-current, i simply type
On OpenBSD 6.4, I simply get "man -O tag=wait: Bad argument". ;-)
> Just like https://man.openbsd.org/ksh#wait
> only at the console. And no, it does *not* require the author to
> say "i want an anchor here" in any special syntax. It just work
Hello Ingo,
Ingo Schwarze wrote in <20181201120713.ga89...@athene.usta.de>:
|John Gardner wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 05:36:25PM +1100:
|> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
|>> Even moderately large systems can be beautifully documented in a
|>> single manual page - for example, a shell
|
|> It's amazi
Hi Bertrand,
Bertrand Garrigues wrote on Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:00:59AM +0100:
> A few checks can be done with:
>
> make check
Oops, i overlooked this part earlier.
OpenBSD-current:
schwarze@isnote $ make check
make check-am
make
make all-am
make check-TESTS
PASS: contrib/gdiffmk/tes
> Software that inherently defies concise description is suspect on
> its face. In all likelihood it was built by accumulation way beyond
> the bounds of any organizing principles that the author(s) may have
> had at the outset.
MDN (Mozilla Development Network) is probably the first offender that
> if you are interested in my perspective - scrap the HTML documentation
> and fix the manpage. The reference manual - i.e. the manpage - is
> really important: when you use some software regularly, you use the
> reference manual all your life. Catering to the experienced user
> is most import
Hi John,
John Gardner wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 05:36:25PM +1100:
> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Even moderately large systems can be beautifully documented in a
>> single manual page - for example, a shell
> It's amazing how true this is. Even with massive man-pages, it's still
> easier to find
> Well, Ali Golhami Rudi made it a few years ago... Reimplementing a Troff
> is a task people can do if they have reasons to do so.
Well, I assume his reasons were to have a Troff variant which supported
right-to-left languages (which, if you think about it, is a pretty glaring
oversight in a type
John Gardner wrote:
> Reimplementing Troff is a task best not attempted at all.
Well, Ali Golhami Rudi made it a few years ago... Reimplementing a Troff
is a task people can do if they have reasons to do so.
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 02:37, Yves Cloutier wrote:
> > I'm in search of any documenta
