> Here is, I think, the third iteration of the patch, taking into
> account Ralph's feedback on the length and overworked nature of the
> previous iteration's diagnostic messages.
LGTM, thanks!
Werner
At 2018-05-04T19:23:15-0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I've attached a proposed patch. I'm not completely thrilled with it
> because some people might interpret it as suggesting that .hy 62 is
> valid; it isn't, but not because it is too large. Still, I would prefer
> to tell people the limit
At 2018-05-06T12:10:13+0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> > My debugging instincts tell me to always report the value of an
> > argument being rejected. For one thing, the user could have passed
> > .hy a register value (possibly with arithmetic manipulation), and if
> > we screw up the validity checks
