Re: [Groff] Why does tty-char.tmac not represent meaning?

2017-06-24 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2017-06-25T02:40:52+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > But "gradient", by picking out one meaning of several > > (gradient, divergence, laplacian) > > I have never seen the "nabla" symbol used for "laplacian". > The Laplacian is the scalar product of the gradient with > itself, or equivalently, the

Re: [Groff] Why does tty-char.tmac not represent meaning?

2017-06-24 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Doug, thanks for commenting, also showing that you are not opposed to the general idea. Doug McIlroy wrote on Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 07:22:11PM -0400: > Please change "gradient" to a generic name. > It is usually read "del" Using that designation would be unfortunate because "del" is also com

Re: [Groff] Why does tty-char.tmac not represent meaning?

2017-06-24 Thread Doug McIlroy
Please change "gradient" to a generic name. It is usually read "del" or "nabla" and it is often symbolized "grad" or "div" But "gradient", by picking out one meaning of several (gradient, divergence, laplacian) can obscure, rather than reveal, the meaning. doug

Re: [Groff] Why does tty-char.tmac not represent meaning?

2017-06-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I'm also appending the patch for ease of reference. After a quick glance: LGTM. Thanks for working on this. Werner