Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?

2016-04-29 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
"James K. Lowden" wrote: |On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:50:52 +0200 |Ingo Schwarze wrote: |Have you experimented with a single index for all man pages? I wonder |how useful that would be, or how it might be subdivided. An index that |spanned pages would be helpful for sets of routines covered by

Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?

2016-04-29 Thread James K. Lowden
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:50:52 +0200 Ingo Schwarze wrote: > I was talking about the CVS HEAD version of the mandoc toolbox from > bsd.lv, sorry that i didn't say that explicitly. Ah, I see, OK. > > I'm pretty sure my man invokes mandoc as "mandoc". Would that be a > > problem? > > That cann

Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?

2016-04-29 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi James, James K. Lowden wrote on Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:40:41AM -0400: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:56:52 +0200 > Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> 4. Let the man(1) steering program fork and exec less(1). > I'm using NetBSD 7.0, and my /usr/bin/man doesn't work as you > describe, at least not for pd

Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?

2016-04-29 Thread James K. Lowden
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:56:52 +0200 Ingo Schwarze wrote: > It can't work when you pipe by hand. Thanks for the detailed explanation, Ingo. I wrote the simplest possible test, and it turned out to be too simple! Einstein, right? > 4. Let the man(1) steering program fork and exec less(1).

Re: [Groff] .if !dTS - GNU extension?

2016-04-29 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi James, James K. Lowden wrote on Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:18:51PM -0400: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:10:22 +0200 > Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> Take a large manual, for example ksh(1). >> With the mandoc-based implementation of man(1), type >> >> $ man ksh >> >> Then inside less(1), type >> >> :