Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform

2016-03-24 Thread Steve Izma
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:21:37PM -0400, Steve Izma wrote: > Subject: Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform > >> ... But I'm wondering if anyone can tell me if groff benefits >> from running on multiple CPU cores and multiple CPUs. >> I assume that another way of asking th

Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform

2016-03-24 Thread James K. Lowden
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:21:37 -0400 Steve Izma wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone can tell me if groff benefits from running on > multiple CPU cores and multiple CPUs. Looking at spawn-pipe.c, the only parallelization you get in groff is the pipeline of preprocessing, formatting, and rendering.

Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform

2016-03-24 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Steve Izma wrote: |On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:25:50PM -0400, Larry Kollar wrote: |> Subject: Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform |>> I'm wondering how CPU configurations affect groff processing |>> speed. |I guess I need to re-state the question. I'm quite familiar

Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform

2016-03-24 Thread Morten Bo Johansen
On 2016-03-24 Steve Izma wrote: > I guess I need to re-state the question. I'm quite familiar with > groff's speed, including with 1000-page (or larger) complex > books. But I'm wondering if anyone can tell me if groff benefits > from running on multiple CPU cores and multiple CPUs. I don't think

Re: [Groff] groff performance in respect to hardware platform

2016-03-24 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Steve, > I suppose another factor is that since the Linux kernel is built for > parallelization, even if groff can only run on a single core, all the > operating system services can run on other cores without interfering > with groff's process. Or do I not know what I'm talking about here? As