On Sat, Feb 01, 2014, hoh...@arcor.de wrote:
>
> Werner LEMBERG wrote (Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:37:05 +0100
> (CET)):
> > Given today's memory abundance and the high velocity of CPUs, the
> > ideal route would be to implement a document-wide algorithm for
> > typesetting a document (in contrast to TeX
Werner LEMBERG wrote (Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:37:05 +0100
(CET)):
> Given today's memory abundance and the high velocity of CPUs, the
> ideal route would be to implement a document-wide algorithm for
> typesetting a document (in contrast to TeX's page-wide approach).
I think, that an author can prev
>> Letter-spacing is bad in general.
>
> I find this statement a bit too broad, especially in the context of
> groff, whose only means of justifying lines presently is through the
> expansion of wordspace, often with ghastly results.
Well, even if it is the only possible solution in groff,
letter-
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 08:06:11PM -0500, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014, Werner Lemberg wrote:
>> Given today's memory abundance and the high velocity of CPUs, the
>> ideal route would be to implement a document-wide algorithm for
>> typesetting a document (in contrast to TeX's page
