Re: [Groff] Boxing text.

2013-03-27 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Anonymous, > I found a rough example out in the wild for how to box text using > groff. This is my attempt to make it work: > > ===8<- > #!/bin/bash > > cat < .B1 > &client > &address1 > &address2 > &address3 > .B2 > EOF > ===8<

Re: [Groff] (no subject)

2013-03-27 Thread Mike Bianchi
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:08:33PM -0400, Anonymous wrote: > Subject: simply trying to put a box around text > > I found a rough example out in the wild for how to box text using > groff. This is my attempt to make it work: > > ===8<- > #!/bin/bash > > ca

[Groff] (no subject)

2013-03-27 Thread Anonymous
Subject: simply trying to put a box around text I found a rough example out in the wild for how to box text using groff. This is my attempt to make it work: ===8<- #!/bin/bash cat <

Re: [Groff] Makefile.in and Autotools

2013-03-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> groff already has a comprehensive Makefile system, which does not > depend on automake; why jeopardise it to migrate to something with > nothing better to offer? *I* won't change it :-) However, if someone is going to integrate gnulib more tightly into groff (which would be a good thing IMHO),

Re: [Groff] Makefile.in and Autotools

2013-03-27 Thread Keith Marshall
On 27/03/13 21:37, Werner LEMBERG wrote: AFAIK, groff has never used automake; I hope it never does. Why not? I find it quite convenient to use for my own project (ttfautohint). If it works for you, great. My experience has been that it creates more problems than it solves; indeed, I have

Re: [Groff] Makefile.in and Autotools

2013-03-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> AFAIK, groff has never used automake; I hope it never does. Why not? I find it quite convenient to use for my own project (ttfautohint). Werner

Re: [Groff] Makefile.in and Autotools

2013-03-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> So can I change the `Makefile.in' file without problems? Yes. groff doesn't use automake. Note, however, that there is a bunch of Makefile.XXX files, and you should check them carefully to find the right spot for your additions. Werner

Re: [Groff] Makefile.in and Autotools

2013-03-27 Thread Keith Marshall
On 27/03/13 20:47, Bernd Warken wrote: For the next `glilypond' version, I need to add something to the file /Makefile.in I know that `automake' replaces this file, but I did not find any `Makefile.am' that is usually used by `automake'. AFAIK, groff has never used automake; I hope it never do

[Groff] Makefile.in and Autotools

2013-03-27 Thread Bernd Warken
For the next `glilypond' version, I need to add something to the file /Makefile.in I know that `automake' replaces this file, but I did not find any `Makefile.am' that is usually used by `automake'. So can I change the `Makefile.in' file without problems? Bernd Warken