Werner Lemberg:
> I don't think so. .DEVTAG-EO-H is very low-level
> (and since of its beta nature, neither .tag nor
> .taga are documented at all); it's a bad idea IMHO
> to hardcode any typographical behaviour with it.
I still cannot agree with it, because the modifica-
tion in question
Werner Lemberg:
> I don't think so. .DEVTAG-EO-H is very low-level
> (and since of its beta nature, neither .tag nor
> .taga are documented at all); it's a bad idea IMHO
> to hardcode any typographical behaviour with it.
I still cannot agree with it, because the modifica-
tion in question
