>> 0 1 2
>>+-+-+-+ ...
>>0 244872 ...
>>
>> It's obvious that the values 0..23 are somehow `assigned' to
>> character cell 0, and for orthogonality we have to assign
>> position 24 already to character cell 1.
>>
>> Another complication is that everyt
Hello, Werner.
Many thanks for the info. I see that the problem
lies deeper than I had thought.
> It's obvious that the values 0..23 are somehow
> 'assigned' to character cell 0, and for orthogo-
> nality we have to assign position 24 already to
> character cell 1.
This is indeed on
Hi Werner,
> 0 1 2
>+-+-+-+ ...
>0 244872 ...
>
> It's obvious that the values 0..23 are somehow `assigned' to character
> cell 0, and for orthogonality we have to assign position 24 already to
> character cell 1.
>
> Another complication is tha