Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL

2010-06-24 Thread Ted Harding
On 24-Jun-10 11:49:00, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> My fix was to use round brackets: >> >>.nr \$2 (\*[misc*pop]) > > I've looked into other places in the code, and since Jörgen has used > the `0' prefix, I did the same for consistency. > Werner I think it is important for people to be awar

Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL

2010-06-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> My fix was to use round brackets: > >.nr \$2 (\*[misc*pop]) I've looked into other places in the code, and since Jörgen has used the `0' prefix, I did the same for consistency. Werner

Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL

2010-06-24 Thread Anton Shepelev
Tadziu Hoffmann: > BVL's list type is "-1". When LE restores the > outer list's settings via l...@pop and m...@pop-nr, > the list type is reset as > >.nr \$2 \*[misc*pop] > > where \$2 ist the register name (in this case, > "li*type") and \*[misc*pop] is the saved type (in > this ca

Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL

2010-06-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> You can fix it by changing the above line in m...@pop-nr to > > .nr \\$2 0\\*[misc*pop] Thanks for the analysis. Fixed in CVS. Werner

Re: [Groff] MM's nested lists: AL inside BVL

2010-06-24 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> Nested lists work well in MM most of the time, but I > have just found a situation wherein MM seems to have > a problem: [snip] BVL's list type is "-1". When LE restores the outer list's settings via l...@pop and m...@pop-nr, the list type is reset as .nr \\$2 \\*[misc*pop] where \\$2 ist