> > Hmm, what do you mean with `more serious graphics'? What
> > operation do you have in mind which can't be done with the scheme
> > I propose?
>
> Technically speaking you are absolutely right.
This relieves me :-)
> This is a nice cando masterpiece of true understanding of how gtroff
> work
Ted,
Problem solved. It was "Pilot error."
Thanks for the quick response. Your technique is most enlightening.
I knew about \z, but was not aware of \Z'...' sequences.
I used your technique and it works well.
I found the ghost line. It was from another line later in my
source file that I w
On 15-Mar-08 22:27:44, Clarke Echols wrote:
> I'm working on a document with a headline:
>
> Are You Sure You're Getting Maximum Value
>
> where the line is set in Helvetica bold with "Sure" set in
> HB italic. I want to underline the word "Sure", but I'm getting
> strange behavior from wha
I'm working on a document with a headline:
Are You Sure You're Getting Maximum Value
where the line is set in Helvetica bold with "Sure" set in
HB italic. I want to underline the word "Sure", but I'm getting
strange behavior from what I thought should be a legitimate approach.
Conditions a
On 15/03/2008, at 03:06 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
If you could manage avoiding ‘cooking’ with a a ’one-part series’
(Schemes 3 and 4), that would be GREAT. Then I would not even mind
if I could not understand its working :-)
Hehe. This would need a new command in groff, and I'm not sure
whe
