Re: [Groff] Request "cf"

2008-02-29 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> In one of my early posts regarding actions a) .. e) I said that > processing an eps image needed something "pre", then the image, then > something "post". I probably didn't understand the situation to comment on this then. > You say that the solution is to use \X with hooks for before and > af

Re: [Groff] Request "cf"

2008-02-29 Thread Miklos Somogyi
Werner, I am glad to see the light at the end of the tunnel. In one of my early posts regarding actions a) .. e) I said that processing an eps image needed something "pre", then the image, then something "post". I reported the problem that with the current tools this required the making of

Re: [Groff] vim syntax file for groff -- treatment of .ig

2008-02-29 Thread Larry Kollar
Dorai Sitaram wrote: This is for Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, if he's still fielding reports on his very useful and tasteful nroff.vim syntax file. This synax file currently highlights a .ig environment as a comment, but assumes that the .ig will always be closed by a double- dot (..), even

Re: [Groff] Request "cf"

2008-02-29 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> After a lot of cutting it is now under 100k, I hope it will get > through. I think I begin to understand. What you want has absolutely nothing to do with .cf, I believe: If you say \X'ps: file foo' grops produces BEGIN END However, you want to insert some stuff right after `BEGIN'

[Groff] vim syntax file for groff -- treatment of .ig

2008-02-29 Thread Dorai Sitaram
This is for Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, if he's still fielding reports on his very useful and tasteful nroff.vim syntax file. This synax file currently highlights a .ig environment as a comment, but assumes that the .ig will always be closed by a double-dot (..), even if the .ig has an argument