Re: [Groff] Diversion of formatted text

2006-04-27 Thread Michail Vidiassov
Dear Miklos, On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Werner LEMBERG wrote: If so, I need to re-phrase the question: how and where from and in what form can someone get hold of the new binary. E.g. those, like me, still on the original Mac groff diet, without compilers, etc. Do I have to upgrade to Tiger, do I

Re: [Groff] Diversion of formatted text

2006-04-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I suspect that `.devicem' is not a macro that one defines outside > the binary of groff and uses it happily. I suspect that it is > something new in the binary. Yep. > If so, I need to re-phrase the question: how and where from and in > what form can someone get hold of the new binary. Aah, I

Re: [Groff] Diversion of formatted text

2006-04-27 Thread Miklos Somogyi
On 26/04/2006, at 4:33 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: By the way, since you have installed the .device and .devicem things, how can one get to use them? `.devicem' is exactly the same as \Y, but `.device' reads its arguments in `copy mode' (which \X doesn't; in most cases this doesn't make any dif