I'll make a singular point: Are you voting on importance? Approval?Mob
logic? Memes trend reddit more than news. What does most "votes"
really mean? Is it's meaning what you want to sort by?
No need to even get into: my team is big so can game this up.
-R
> On Oct 30, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Mike Con
> On Feb 12, 2014, at 5:52 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Chris Peterson
>> wrote:
>>
>> Announcing Firefox's "not ads" at the Interactive Advertising Bureau's
>> annual meeting gives a strong impression that these are, in fact, ads and
>> will bring all
> On Dec 14, 2014, at 9:58 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> How will you decide which feeds are dead? Are we talking dead as in the RSS
> feed errors or dead as in no recent content (inactive blog?)
There are quite a few that 4xx 5xx or just don't resolve.
___
detail.
>
>
The plan would be to switch over the general feeds to tag specific feeds by
reaching out to blog owners. Tag/category are essentially the same for
Planet purposes, people have used either for years with Planet. Technically
speaking there's no difference.
--
Robert Accettura
rob...@accettura.com
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
efit analysis of merging repositories given the need to separate these
>> project. I’m asking the platform and release folks to comment on this.
>>
>> 12. This message is about the future and there’s a lot to work out. It’s
>> explicitly not to announce changes in daily activities at
I will be stepping down as owner for Planet Mozilla as I've got limited
time to dedicate lately. Mike Hoye has expressed interest in leading Planet
forward.
--
Robert Accettura
rob...@accettura.com
___
governance mailing list
gover
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Samuel Sidler wrote:
>
>> On Friday, July 27, 2012 12:18:38 PM UTC+7, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>> > Another question is, "Should Mozilla compel its employees to
>> 'responsible
>> > disclose' work that was