Le 07/08/2013 12:03, Tom Farrow a écrit :
I find that the idea would be beneficial to the community since currently, a
lot of activity is done based on trust and while having trust in Mozilla is
important, there should be some way to reinforce that trust legally.
I'd like to clarify on this poi
Le 12/08/2013 15:55, Gervase Markham a écrit :
On 07/08/13 11:03, Tom Farrow wrote:
I find that the idea would be beneficial to the community since
currently, a lot of activity is done based on trust and while having
trust in Mozilla is important, there should be some way to reinforce
that trust
Le 04/11/2013 20:32, Gervase Markham a écrit :
Majken asked for a location for the current version of the proposal to
build a trusted group of Mozillians. Here it is:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Contribute/Trusted
This proposal doesn't explain the problem it tries to solve (and I'm
pointing that b
Le 06/11/2013 17:31, Gervase Markham a écrit :
On 04/11/13 21:26, David Bruant wrote:
This proposal doesn't explain the problem it tries to solve (and I'm
pointing that because it's not really clear to me what problem that is).
The three bullets at the top are three example pro
Le 27/11/2013 20:15, Nukeador a écrit :
Hi all,
I open this thread here because I want a wider discussion about this topic.
Today, Wassap (one of the whatsapp clients we had on the Firefox
Marketplace) was removed due take down notice from Whatsapp Inc.
As far as I was able to discover, Whatsa
Le 29/11/2013 02:47, Robert Kaiser a écrit :
David Bruant schrieb:
The good news is that the marketplace code is open source. In my
opinion, that's the most important decision made for FirefoxOS.
Sorry, but that is hard to understand without more explanation. The
latter sentence is a p
Le 09/01/2014 14:51, Kyle Huey a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:50 AM, wrote:
How can we call a vote? How can we appeal?
Mozilla is not a democracy. There are no votes. If the relevant module
owner does not wish to make a change the only person that can overrule them
is Brendan Eich.
In
Le 01/04/2014 12:02, sensualworl...@gmail.com a écrit :
I believe in equality for all.
So do I.
Mr. Eich's active stance against gay marriage is troubling, and run contrary to
the mission and goals of Mozilla.
Does it? I'm not sure I read anything that suggests so in the Manifesto.
Please re
Le 04/04/2014 02:19, f1...@nospampobox.com a écrit :
On 4/2/2014 6:42 AM On a whim, David Bruant pounded out on the keyboard
Brendan Eich isn't Firefox. He hasn't written all the code. Not even
most of it. According to this https://gps.pastebin.mozilla.org/4739342
he hasn't
Le 01/05/2014 16:58, Stormy Peters a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Florent Fayolle <
florent.fayoll...@gmail.com> wrote:
The question about using GA or not is crucial but rather a long-term
question [1].
What worries me the most here is the AJAX requests made at each click on
that pa
Le 02/05/2014 05:46, Jim a écrit :
The feedback Mozilla is trying to gather on the usability of the page
could have been obtained using 'feedback' buttons.
If by that you mean that the web page could have a button that pops up a
form that people fill in and submit, this is nonsensical (if you me
Le 03/05/2014 05:52, Jim a écrit :
On 2014-05-02 07:45, David Bruant wrote:
Le 02/05/2014 05:46, Jim a écrit :
The feedback Mozilla is trying to gather on the usability of the
page could have been obtained using 'feedback' buttons.
If by that you mean that the web page could hav
Le 05/05/2014 08:47, Jim a écrit :
On 2014-05-03 08:34, David Bruant wrote:
You need to understand the constraints and then apply creative
design within these constraints. For example, a row of attractive
feedback buttons that work with JS disabled, and when JS is enabled
zoom in on these
Le 05/05/2014 11:16, Ryan Kelly a écrit :
On 5/05/2014 6:26 PM, David Bruant wrote:
Le 05/05/2014 08:47, Jim a écrit :
Now, tell us why Facebook and Twitter were associated prominently with
children pleading for their privacy and control on the web?
I don't know. What is this children
Le 05/12/2015 18:08, Daniel Glazman a écrit :
On 05/12/2015 16:44, Mark Banner wrote:
Note that for add-ons dropping xul etc has been already communicated as
part of other plans:
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/08/21/the-future-of-developing-firefox-add-ons/
And this is another huge thre
Le 20/07/2012 12:33, Henri Sivonen a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Jorge Villalobos wrote:
* Add-ons must be installed either using the add-on install system or the
install opt-in dialog
[https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/08/11/strengthening-user-control-of-add-ons/].
...
Per bl
Le 27/07/2012 07:46, Robert O'Callahan a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Samuel Sidler wrote:
If they're going to use Mozilla's name, I think yes. It reflects
incredibly poor on Mozilla and hurts its reputation.
Perhaps so. However, in this case I can't tell that Mozilla's name was u
Hi,
At MozCampEU 2012, I think during Leadership Panel, Brian King
mentionned that Mozilla (I would guess MoFo&MoCo) and the community
sometimes have unaligned priorities. After being asked, he gave 2
examples; one being that the community still maintains SeaMonkey which
is not a priority for MoFo
Le 11/09/2012 22:31, Rubén Martín a écrit :
> El 11/09/12 22:13, David Bruant escribió:
>> At MozCampEU 2012, I think during Leadership Panel, Brian King
>> mentionned that Mozilla (I would guess MoFo&MoCo) and the community
>> sometimes have unaligned priorities. Aft
Le 11/09/2012 22:54, Justin Lebar a écrit :
>> If we all, volunteers and paid employees, have the same informations
>> about the world and agree on the Manifesto, I don't see a reason for
>> having our priorities not aligned. Please tell me if you see such a reason.
> There's another criterion miss
Le 12/09/2012 00:02, Rubén Martín a écrit :
> El 11/09/12 22:55, David Bruant escribió:
>> I'm somewhat puzzled by your use of "we" and "them" like if there were
>> two groups to oppose. I wish we just all acted like one group. Within
>> MoCo/MoFo,
Le 12/09/2012 01:22, Rubén Martín a écrit :
El 12/09/12 00:09, David Bruant escribió:
>Reps are by definition leaders inside Mozilla, they know really well
>about the values and mission and want to take a step forward.
I quoted 2 pages of the wiki and what you're saying is not par
Le 12/09/2012 06:04, Majken Connor a écrit :
I think Ruben's suggestion is that since the reps program helps
support and organize contributors globally the reps program could
present the framework for getting feedback from the community at large.
The words you choose to describe what the reps pr
Le 12/09/2012 14:13, Boris Zbarsky a écrit :
On 9/11/12 10:32 PM, David Bruant wrote:
Would you work on what has been agreed on?
Maybe.
Would I spend every possible moment working on what has been agreed
on, if I disagree with it? Perhaps not.
Mozilla does not own its contributors, nor
Le 12/09/2012 16:38, Boris Zbarsky a écrit :
On 9/12/12 2:07 PM, David Bruant wrote:
Are they doomed to stay outside of the room of people who make strategic
decisions?
I think there's a basic assumption here: that there is such a room.
I'm not sure there is.I think that the major
Le 12/09/2012 18:48, Majken Connor a écrit :
> There's a lot to reply to, but I think that's derailing the conversation.
What gave you this feeling toward Boris' response? It sounded on track
to me. "Perhaps non-employees feel like this is not an option open for
them?" was a great eye opener to me.
x27;s time I get interested if not involved in the Reps program
if the scope has changed this way.
Thanks,
David
Le 13/09/2012 17:34, William Quiviger a écrit :
> On Sep 12, 2012, at 11:49 AM, David Bruant wrote:
>
>>> So the reps program is really a network of community leaders,
Le 12/09/2012 19:24, L. David Baron a écrit :
> So I think one of the assumptions you're making is that it's good to
> agree on priorities.
Yes. I don't remember the full context, but it seemed like Brian King's
assumption too.
> I think I disagree with that assumption. I think we do need to have
Hi Alina,
Le 14/09/2012 02:09, Alina Mierlus a écrit :
The thing is, Mozilla is a meritocracy (or at least is trying to be
as much as possible)
I'm slightly changing of topic, just to share a comment I think is
relevant on that particular point.
I've had discussions with several employees who
Le 19/09/2012 01:25, Blake Kaplan a écrit :
> David Bruant wrote:
>> I've had discussions with several employees who shared with me that they
>> felt somewhat guilty to be there, because they hadn't been a volunteer
>> contributor before being an employee
Le 18/09/2012 19:00, John Jensen a écrit :
> Hi David,
>
>> The hiring process, for various reasons
>> cannot be considered as a meritocracy
> Could you expand on that a bit?
In answers by other people, it's been answered, but here are some elements:
First, Mozilla can only hire in places where it
Le 19/09/2012 11:43, Gijs Kruitbosch a écrit :
On 19/09/2012 09:31 AM, David Bruant wrote:
Le 18/09/2012 19:00, John Jensen a écrit :
Hi David,
The hiring process, for various reasons
cannot be considered as a meritocracy
Could you expand on that a bit?
In answers by other people, it's
Le 26/12/2012 10:45, Gervase Markham a écrit :
On 25/12/12 21:47, Majken Connor wrote:
Hi all. I have some concerns about the posts on the official facebook
and
twitter accounts.
For those not on Facebook and/or Twitter, and for clarity, would you
mind quoting the posts you are concerned abo
Le 24/01/2013 20:41, L. David Baron a écrit :
On Wednesday 2013-01-23 11:19 -0800, ake...@mozilla.com wrote:
We have not made any announcements around the availability of
updates (Mozilla-provided or otherwise) at this time, and no
overarching decisions have been made for the life of Firefox OS.
Hi Georg,
Some questions inlined
Le 21/08/2017 à 17:56, Georg Fritzsche via governance a écrit :
Hi,
for Firefox we want to better understand how people use our product to
improve their experience. To do that, we are planning to run a new SHIELD
study that tests how we can collect additional d
35 matches
Mail list logo
