On 12/17/13, 8:30 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
> Instead Mozilla should shine light on these companies' unscrupulous
> behavior and win users with respectful privacy solutions.
I think this could be an Western biased view. Why do you believe that
Chinese users will be receptive to those kinds of m
On 12/18/13, 8:35 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 12/18/2013, 5:03 PM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
On 12/17/13, 8:30 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
> Instead Mozilla should shine light on these companies' unscrupulous
> behavior and win users with respectful privacy solutions.
I think this could be
On 12/19/13, 7:38 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 12/18/2013, 11:49 PM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
On 12/18/13, 8:35 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 12/18/2013, 5:03 PM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
On 12/17/13, 8:30 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
> Instead Mozilla should shine light on these companies' unsc
ragged into
that conversation because Ehsan seems to want me there or can't see that
I'm not going there.
- A
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Asa Dotzler <mailto:a...@mozilla.com>> wrote:
On 12/19/13, 7:38 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 12/18/2013, 11:49
On 1/7/14, 1:56 PM, davidweldonbosw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to suggest that Pierros Papadeas take over as the new owner of the
Participation Metrics module.
He has been very active with contribution data projects and will be focusing on
this issue as one of the owners of the Community Bui
aving recently lost two of its peers, could probably
use some additional help. If you're interested, I suggest you reach out
to Robert.
- A
7 years ago, Asa Dotzler wrote:
The feed aggregator at planet.mozilla.org [Planet Mozilla] is a
collection of feeds published by more than 1
On 3/11/14, 8:49 AM, Majken Connor wrote:
I am not sure if this is true, but it seems that when things have been
moved "to community" there hasn't been a transition plan that has set the
community group (vs org group) up for success. What I mean is that, it
seems like Mozilla has said "these are
On 5/23/14, 11:49 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 21/05/14 17:58, Matt Claypotch wrote:
# Audience
The Project Meeting will switch from a 100% public call to available for
all Mozillians. The goal is to have as lightweight a barrier to viewing and
participating in the meeting as possible. The off
On 7/25/14, 3:58 AM, Rubén Martín wrote:
2014-07-25 12:31 GMT+02:00 Gervase Markham :
On 25/07/14 10:48, Rubén Martín wrote:
As far as I know currently Firefox checks a local downloaded list, not
directly. Am I wrong?
As I understand it, if Firefox hits a positive on the downloaded list of
U
On 8/26/14, 12:59 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-08-26, 3:01 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
On 2014-08-26 2:34 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-08-26, 1:31 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
I share your concerns, but I don't think we can avoid being subject to
the discovery laws, however egregious, of any country
On 12/15/14, 5:15 AM, Axel Hecht wrote:
On 12/15/14 9:22 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Robert Accettura
wrote:
On Dec 14, 2014, at 9:58 PM, Benjamin Kerensa
wrote:
How will you decide which feeds are dead? Are we talking dead as in the
RSS
feed errors
On 7/27/2012 12:42 PM, Daniel Glazman wrote:
Le 26/07/12 00:33, Winston Bowden a écrit :
We'd like to make the decision on how we'll move forward in one week. If you
see any reason to lengthen the posting period, please let me know and we'll
consider an extension.
Mozilla has a few feet in
On 11/28/2012 5:01 AM, David Ascher wrote:
honored and looking forward to it.
--da
Mitchell Baker wrote:
Done: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Activities
Thanks David!
ml
This is fantastic news. Thank you, David, for taking this on.
- A
On 11/24/12 6:38 PM, Mitchell Baker wrote:
I'
Almost three years ago, we created a Participation Metrics module to
develop, monitor, and analyze metrics relating to participation in the
Mozilla project.
Though I've been something of an absentee owner for a while, that has
not stopped the work of this module from having valuable impact on
On 6/9/2013 7:44 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
It's my opinion that Mozilla has the freedom to build architecturally
secure systems because it doesn't have a business model that is predicated
on mining users' data, so making the data unavailable—even to Mozilla
itself—isn't disruptive.
This is an
On 7/2/2013 9:28 AM, Majken Connor wrote:
Sure, but it's relevant to the higher level question - "how to continue to
support users who are currently on XP?" It's an interesting idea, what
would be the right place to discuss it? A new thread here or elsewhere?
I don't think Linux is at all relev
16 matches
Mail list logo
