On 12/16/17 3:35 PM, Jean-Bernard Marcon wrote:
I am surprised nobody raised the issue already (maybe I missed the right
channel)
It's been raised, though not all the channels that it's been raised on
are public.
Note that the Looking Glass addon has been unshipped already, though
that may
On 12/16/17 4:09 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Yes this is a privacy and ethical issue
Benjamin,
What, exactly, is the privacy issue? The addon involved does invade
privacy in any way I am aware of (especially given that it does nothing
at all, privacy-related or otherwise, unless a certain p
Injecting addons whether enabled or disabled into a set of users based on
their geographic location is a privacy issue.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:29 AM Boris Zbarsky via governance <
governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> On 12/16/17 4:09 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > Yes this is a privacy and
On 12/19/17 3:04 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Injecting addons whether enabled or disabled into a set of users based
on their geographic location is a privacy issue.
Ah, I didn't realize this addon was injected based on geographic location.
That said, it's a privacy issue only if the existence
Hi,
An idea came up in Austin of having a "Rust Peers" list.
Because Rust expertise is unevenly spread, sometimes a patch author or
patch reviewer might want a Rust expert to review a patch from the point of
view of whether it is reasonable Rust code. (E.g. I did this in bug
1423840, where I got
