Re: Usage of Differential Privacy & RAPPOR

2017-08-24 Thread Kurt Roeckx via governance
On 2017-08-23 16:33, Alex Gaynor wrote: I had the same question, but it looks like RAPPOR has gotten significantly more advanced since I originally learned about the "just boolean questions" version. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.01214.pdf explains how to build privacy preserving measurements withou

Re: React license and Mozilla/Firefox

2017-08-24 Thread Nikos Roussos via governance
On 08/23/2017 05:54 PM, Luis Villa via governance wrote: > This is not a substitute for an analysis specific to Mozilla's particular > needs, but Heather and I have both published analyses of this issue that > may be helpful for Mozillians seeking to learn more about the issue: > > https://heather

Re: Usage of Differential Privacy & RAPPOR

2017-08-24 Thread Georg Fritzsche via governance
Hi, if users turn off data sharing through the preferences, we will not submit this data. Firefox will always respect the users choice. Georg On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:32 PM, genetizen--- via governance < governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: > How do you see this study lining up with the data a

Re: Usage of Differential Privacy & RAPPOR

2017-08-24 Thread hagis6789--- via governance
It would be better to keep it opt-in as the default, but during installation prompt with the option to opt-in to telemetry, rather than quietly letting the install go with the default as opted-out. Also please make sure you've got the security precautions mentioned in my earlier post. 1. Keep

Re: Usage of Differential Privacy & RAPPOR

2017-08-24 Thread hagis6789--- via governance
I'm just a regular Firefox user, albeit on who spent over 30 years in IT, including time on sensitive applications like BANKING and HEALTH CARE. Whether kept as Opt-in or changed to Opt-out this is my feedback on maintaining privacy while monitoring product use: 1. I trust telemetry and dumps a