Good day,
When someone disagrees, pace down and come back to it later; don't keep
working on them (or the issue) in frustration. From my observation
failing to do this has contributed to a majority of bans on the
Internet.
Since Mozilla software is free, you are not obligated to stay on
bugzilla.
On 10/8/2016 3:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org allows
tickets to be marked as both WONTFIX and resolved
In Bugzilla, a bug can be in multiple states that indicate what work
remains to be done o
Hi Svetlana,
On 2016-10-09 05:33, Svetlana Tkachenko wrote:
Good day,
When someone disagrees, pace down and come back to it later; don't keep
working on them (or the issue) in frustration. From my observation
failing to do this has contributed to a majority of bans on the
Internet.
I agree th
On 2016-10-09 07:58, Wayne wrote:
On 10/8/2016 3:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org allows
tickets to be marked as both WONTFIX and resolved
In Bugzilla, a bug can be in multiple states that indi
On 10/9/2016 10:46 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2016-10-09 07:58, Wayne wrote:
On 10/8/2016 3:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org allows
tickets to be marked as both WONTFIX and resolved
In Bug
Hi Boris,
On 2016-10-08 15:17, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
[...]
3. Three of these were marked as incomplete, when there was no
request for any more information about these.
I agree that private mail to ask for the information may have been better.
On 2016-10-09 12:49, Wayne wrote:
On 10/9/2016 10:46 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2016-10-09 07:58, Wayne wrote:
On 10/8/2016 3:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/8/16 11:39 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
2. The ticket in which I reported that bugs.mozilla.org allows
tickets to be marked as
Filipus,
This is my last post in this thread, since it's pretty clear to me that
this is going nowhere. But just on the off chance that you really are
missing something instead of being willfully obtuse, I will try one last
time.
On 10/9/16 2:15 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
That is not even
Filipus,
This is a governance mailing list and the issue you've raised is not a
governance matter rather something that deals with participation and
conduct.
You might wish to contact the participation team but this matter seems
settled and final.
On Oct 9, 2016 11:48 AM, "Filipus Klutiero" wro
Hi Benjamin,
On 2016-10-09 15:13, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Filipus,
This is a governance mailing list and the issue you've raised is not a
governance matter rather something that deals with participation and
conduct.
Sorry but which issue are you referring to?
[...]
--
Filipus Klutiero
http:
Good day,
> I agree that waiting can help, but could you clarify which person you are
> talking about, and how long you think is optimal to wait before coming
> back?
No particular person - this is a broad principle.
> In any case, forking an organization as known
> as Mozilla should not be done
11 matches
Mail list logo
