I have been working with Tom Farrow (tad) and some other community members
to put together a proposal for better delivering Web Services to
Communities.This would restructure the delivery of services like hosting,
domains and emails which are currently provided to communities. Creating a
module wou
I'd encourage that a peer be from the Mozilla InfoSec Team to audit and vet
the accesses to user data that volunteers are being given access too.
If a security issue arose on any of these community hosted platforms
Mozilla would take a PR hit for not having vetted the processes and access
to user
Good to see a proposal.
I think it'd be good to articulate a bit more of the plan and its purpose,
before diving into the details of module structure, which feel a bit
premature to me.
In particular, I'd like to understand:
- what kinds of websites does Mozilla offer / underwrite, and for what
p
I'll take a first go at answering these questions, but Pierros or Tom might
have important info to add:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:25 PM, David Ascher
wrote:
> Good to see a proposal.
>
> I think it'd be good to articulate a bit more of the plan and its purpose,
> before diving into the details
Thanks Kensie --
I wholeheartedly support the general idea of trying to bring some cohesion
to the systems that still allow decentralized expression by volunteers of
Mozilla in their local context. We can and should make it easier for
people to create web presences and collaborative spaces where
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:04 PM, David Ascher
wrote:
> Thanks Kensie --
>
> I wholeheartedly support the general idea of trying to bring some cohesion
> to the systems that still allow decentralized expression by volunteers of
> Mozilla in their local context. We can and should make it easier fo
I may be missing some background. Can you explain what you would do as
module owners that you can't do today, and/or whose code or actions you
seek to influence as module owner?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, 7:44 PM Majken Connor wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:04 PM, David Ascher
> wrote:
>
>>
I think approving a module for Mozilla Communities Web Services would be
a great low-cost way to support the community sites that we're already
providing resources for. That this is just writing down a process that's
already happening is a good sign for it's viability, I think.
I also really l
