Hum. Apparently, _someone_ in bizdev thought that "revenue sharing"
doesn't involve money, and spread information inside Mozilla
accordingly. :rolling eyes:
It seems that we do have a revenue sharing agreement with Pocket. If I
understand correctly, we did not receive money for integrating it (whi
Would you agree though that while you were not paid to integrate
that it was probably known that there was a revenue sharing deal
going into this and that roughly translates to incentivizing
the integration?
I'm sure someone on the Firefox Team didn't wake up one morning
and say "Great Scotts we a
I don't have details, but I can only imagine that yes, someone in the
leadership team or just below pushed for this integration based on this
deal. If my memory serves all of this happened with the previous
leadership team, so I can only hope that this piece of history won't
repeat itself.
On 17/1
I should add that this was not a case of "money versus something that
Mozilla users wanted", but rather a case of "the core Mozilla Community
clearly doesn't want it but User Research suggests that most Mozilla
users actually do". I remember that we had numbers at the time, although
I don't quite r
On 12/17/15 15:08, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
I'm sure someone on the Firefox Team didn't wake up one morning
and say "Great Scotts we are missing Pocket in Firefox!" and AFAIK
this was not on any long term roadmap.
Having a reading list was, in fact, plotted out as a desired Firefox
feature. Bef
Hi all,
Let's be perfectly clear here: the decision to integrate (and continue
shipping) Pocket in Firefox did not, and does not, have anything to do with
money. I can understand how people can fear the worst, so I'd like to set
the record straight as much as I can.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:08 P
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Mike Connor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Let's be perfectly clear here: the decision to integrate (and continue
> shipping) Pocket in Firefox did not, and does not, have anything to do with
> money. I can understand how people can fear the worst, so I'd like to set
> the
Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> There are hundreds of other pieces of feedback about Pocket including new
> comments left daily and I would encourage Mozilla to really look at whether
> this feature serves users and is what they want.
This is quite interesting; I for one find it remarkably convenient. Th
On Friday, December 18, 2015 at 10:06:03 AM UTC+6, Eric Shepherd wrote:
> This is quite interesting; I for one find it remarkably convenient. That
> said, however, I was already a Pocket user before this integration occurred.
You're biased, aren't you? Your opinion barely could be extrapolated to a
I don't think looking at 90 days is fair. Let's look at 7 days, at least
there's something manageable
https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/?q=pocket&date_start=2015-12-10&selected=7d
9 'pocket' feedback entries, out of 3893 results (I'm counting only
'Firefox', that's about 39% of the entire 7 days
10 matches
Mail list logo
