I don't usually get involved in these sorts of discussions, but I have to voice
my objection to this decision. There was no consultation that I could tell. I
only started using Pocket a few months ago, so I didn't really notice when the
icon moved on my toolbar. But now it's no longer a removabl
On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 10:59:56 PM UTC+1, tucker@gmail.com wrote:
> (Pasted from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1172126. There are
> some comments on Hacker News at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9667809).
>
> Mozilla's recent integration with Pocket, a proprietary thi
Still no "more formal reply"... I'm kinda on tenterhooks here, wondering if
I'll have to switch (after, OMG, 16 years) to SRWare Iron or something.
I wonder if EFF will switch for TorBrowser? RMS must be biting his feet over
this.
___
governance mail
On 10/07/2015 16:27, Francois Marier wrote:
>> Discussion Group:mozilla.dev.platform
>
> Would mozilla.dev.security be more appropriate?
There's some signs that it will get users outside of security features,
so maybe not.
--
GCP
___
governance m
Almost 4 years ago, Mike Shaver handed me the reigns of Firefox module
ownership [1]. At the time, he said:
> While being an employee of Mozilla is by no means a necessity for module
> ownership in Mozilla, the Firefox module is so critical and so active
> that it really deserves the attention of
Thanks for all your work Gavin and I think Dave can provide leadership to
take Firefox to where it needs to go.
On Jul 13, 2015 5:58 PM, "Gavin Sharp" wrote:
>
> Almost 4 years ago, Mike Shaver handed me the reigns of Firefox module
> ownership [1]. At the time, he said:
>
> > While being an empl
On Monday, July 13, 2015 at 10:11:20 AM UTC-5, quantumpart...@gmail.com wrote:
> I don't usually get involved in these sorts of discussions, but I have to
> voice my objection to this decision. There was no consultation that I could
> tell. I only started using Pocket a few months ago, so I didn'
