> We have seen volunteers & Staffs leaving Mozilla and joining organizations
> that totally opposes the Mozilla mission,
I have a pretty strong reaction to that statement.
As a former paid-staff myself, I'll put it this way:
You can take me from the mission but you can not take the mission fro
Hello everyone this is Dicky Moe, again. We are sad to join again and write up.
We just want to make some points clear before you dig yourself in.
We went anonymous not because we are afraid. There is no reason for us to be!
# Mozilla its paying for our daily bread, but it does provide us com
Thank you for appreciating my efforts. Hopefully since that is the case,
you will take my reply to heart.
I am not sure what specific incidents have happened that have made you call
out these particular people here, but in several of your accusations you
are misinformed.
Pierros is still owner of
I want to start off by encouraging you to dialogue with those teams
you feel need
improvement. I do not think an anonymous email to all these lists
including many that
really play no role in the issues you raise helps move your issues forward.
The ad hominem attacks are really unnecessary and that
Hello, Governance.
I wanted to let you all know that we're in the early stages of
respinning the quarterly Bugzilla database-dump-for-researchers process,
which has been lying fallow after being discontinued as a peripheral
part of the PII-chemspill cleanup last year.
The reason we're doing
This is not mainly people like WilliamQ, Pierros, Brian or Ruben who were
the cause of what is happening now! but can be the choice of goals (one
million, and firefoxOS webmaker) that have imposed changes and swapping
positions!
The Reps program was exactly what Mozilla is looking for to give volu
