Re: Ownership of the Rhino project

2015-01-29 Thread Gavin Sharp
OK, I have updated https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Other#Rhino accordingly. Please feel free to adjust the information there (peers, source directory, Bugzilla component, URL, discussion group, etc.). To adjust the newsgroup/mailing lists you can file a mozilla.org::Discussion Forums bug at https

Re: Logging All Public Project IRC Channels

2015-01-29 Thread Benjamin Kerensa
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Byron Jones wrote: > Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: >> >> The de facto standard place seems to be http://logs.glob.uno/ (CC'ing >> glob, who AFAIK is running this). I don't know if there's interest in >> moving that somewhere more mozilla-official-y. > > > there's been som

Re: Logging All Public Project IRC Channels

2015-01-29 Thread Yvan Boily
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Byron Jones wrote: > > Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: > >> > >> The de facto standard place seems to be http://logs.glob.uno/ (CC'ing > >> glob, who AFAIK is running this). I don't know if there's interest in > >

Re: Logging All Public Project IRC Channels

2015-01-29 Thread Benjamin Kerensa
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Yvan Boily wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Benjamin Kerensa > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Byron Jones wrote: >> > Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: >> >> >> >> The de facto standard place seems to be http://logs.glob.uno/ (CC'ing >> >> glob,

Re: Ownership of the Rhino project

2015-01-29 Thread mitchell baker
thanks! mitchell On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote: > OK, I have updated https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Other#Rhino > accordingly. Please feel free to adjust the information there (peers, > source directory, Bugzilla component, URL, discussion group, etc.). > > To adjust the

Re: Logging All Public Project IRC Channels

2015-01-29 Thread Francesco Lodolo [:flod]
Il 29/01/15 22:15, Benjamin Kerensa ha scritto: By moving forward I mean moving to the next step which is privacy and legal review. But in talking with a few different people it seems this will pass with flying colors since we would just be bringing this communication medium into parity with ot