On 01/27/2015 05:55 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> The justification is that we are doing it wrong by defaulting to
> closed decision making where not everyone can transparently see all
> the discussions we have in the project.
>
> Great post that talks about this discussion btw and the importance
On 1/27/2015 6:29 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
On 01/27/2015 05:55 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
The justification is that we are doing it wrong by defaulting to
closed decision making where not everyone can transparently see all
the discussions we have in the project.
Great post that talks about thi
On 2015-01-27 12:59 PM, Patrick Cloke wrote:
From (kind of) following this thread it seems that the argument really
boils down to whether it should be opt-in or opt-out.
I'd intended this request to be only for product- and project-related
channels, and even then to be opt-in.
Blanket opt-ou
On 1/27/2015 1:12 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
On 2015-01-27 12:59 PM, Patrick Cloke wrote:
From (kind of) following this thread it seems that the argument really
boils down to whether it should be opt-in or opt-out.
I'd intended this request to be only for product- and project-related
channels, and e
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
> On 2015-01-27 12:59 PM, Patrick Cloke wrote:
>>
>>
>> From (kind of) following this thread it seems that the argument really
>> boils down to whether it should be opt-in or opt-out.
>
> I'd intended this request to be only for product- and proje
On 2015-01-27 1:51 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
I'd intended this request to be only for product- and project-related
channels, and even then to be opt-in.
Blanket opt-out enrollment in anything doesn't really sound like us.
- mhoye
Opting-i
On 2015-01-27 2:11 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
On 2015-01-27 1:51 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
I'd intended this request to be only for product- and project-related
channels, and even then to be opt-in. Blanket opt-out enrollment in
anything doesn't r
On Tuesday 2015-01-27 13:40 -0500, Patrick Cloke wrote:
> And that's how I took it, but it seems that it was taken to mean "Let's log
> everything on IRC" or (slightly less strong) "Let's log all channels". Opt-in
> logging essentially matches what we have now.
I'd phrase it a little differently
On 2015-01-27 2:17 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I'm having a really hard time parsing most of the conversation here.
It seems that most people are under the false impression that IRC
conversations are private by default. That is not the case.
That a user's expectations are based on inaccurate in
I've gone ahead and noted this change in the wiki:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Activities#Commit_Access_Implementation
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Commit_Access_Implementation_module
Marcia: I will let you fill in the "Peers" section as you see fit.
Gavin
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Gav
I am also for open by default, but I think that we also need to take human
behaviour into account, not just the technical possibilities. I think given
how Mozilla operates, publicly (not just for Mozillians) available logs
would be akin to streaming every conference room over vidyo by default.
This
Majken,
This
> Regarding the bots, you can set a bot to only send a message to the same
> nick once, so I think that actually can be done properly. I was also on a
> bug ages ago to update the message you get when you connect to the server
> for the first time. This would also be a place to menti
On 27/01/2015 19:11, Mike Hoye wrote:
On 2015-01-27 1:51 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
I'd intended this request to be only for product- and project-related
channels, and even then to be opt-in. Blanket opt-out enrollment in
anything doesn't rea
13 matches
Mail list logo
