Hi M.,
"1. Brendan was not fired and was not asked by the Board to resign. Brendan
voluntarily submitted his resignation. The Board acted in response by inviting
him to remain at Mozilla in another C-level position. Brendan declined that
offer. The Board respects his decision."
Do you really
Today I got a nice email from someone inside Mozilla, in response to my angry
post elsewhere, explaining Mozilla's actions. He ended his email with:
"Open dialogue is an important part of Mozilla's commitment to open, honest and
community-driven communication, and we remain committed to a free,
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 6:32:04 PM UTC-6, Jim wrote:
> On 2014-04-16 17:44, Majken Connor wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:10 PM, wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> Thanks for responding.
>
> >>
>
> >> 1) Why didn't they offer him the CEO position? Has Mozilla attempted
>
> >> to
>
> >> pers
David,
If I understand message correctly, you believe that Brendan resigned
because of protests inside Mozilla. I would like to convince you that
this is not the case.
A few employees of Mozilla voiced their opposition against Brendan's
appointment as CEO for political reasons, but we are talking
Ze'ev,
Thanks for voicing your concern. Your analysis is interesting but I
believe that the situation is very different.
By and large, employees of Mozilla reacted in support for Brendan,
regardless of their own views. There were a few exceptions (4 employees
that I know of), but if you look at t
