On 7/28/2017 2:06 PM, Emma Humphries wrote:
I want to hear back from NSS and Mail/Thunderbird/Sea Monkey on this before
I remove this.
Thunderbird has no super-review requirement, so if there has been any
usage of this it fits the pattern previously noted of really being a
request for a secon
.
R Kent James
(former) Chair of the Thunderbird Council
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
are only changes in peers, we did not
attempt to pick particular people as owners of modules in most cases.
R. Kent James
Chair, Thunderbird Council
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
ut what the decisions are. Without clarity, it is very
difficult to achieve the unity of direction that we need within the
Thunderbird community to make some very difficult decisions on our own
direction.
--
R. Kent James
Chair, Thunderbird Council
@rkentjames
_
On 12/4/2015 8:48 AM, Douglas Turner wrote:
If there is a plan, please reference it! I guess what I am thinking here
is that there is a difference between writing new stuff using html5 and
rewriting all of Firefox to remove XUL.
I think that you are seeing what is the common experience of peop
On 12/3/2015 8:09 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
I'm just going to add that Mitchell's email while we u see stand what she
said I think the messaging could have been different. I'm unsure if PR was
consulted but the end result has been very negative media for Thunderbird
as a project and Mozilla acr
On 12/3/2015 4:01 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Andrew Sutherland
wrote:
2) When you have addressed the technical debt, you potentially are left
with something that is not the same product that Thunderbird was to
begin with[1]. (:rkent's post at
https://mail.mozilla.
On 9/9/2015 4:42 PM, Majken Connor wrote:
There is an implicit assumption in the way this is worded that "MY
>government is assumed to be benign, but YOUR government may be dangerous."
>
I don't read it that way, could you be more specific on what parts give you
this impression? I'd like to see
these days. See also the large number of comments at
https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/2015/08/thunderbird-and-end-to-end-email-encryption-should-this-be-a-priority/
R Kent James
Chair, Thunderbird Council
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
On 6/30/2015 7:10 PM, timeless wrote:
Also, if there is some resolution, it'd be helpful if there were a
reply to this thread indicating what that resolution was (e.g. a bug
report, or a policy post).
In the end, we were allowed to define a mailman email list (which was
just an easy way to m
On 6/12/2015 10:40 AM, f1...@pobox.com wrote:
Actually, the rest of your comment was snipped above to support Kent's
argument, where you state:
"If we changed the campaign now then we'd get a backlash from users who
oppose censorship."
I'm not suggesting that the campaign be changed. I am just
On 6/9/2015 3:23 PM, Majken Connor wrote:
the play on the F*bomb is definitely there
but it did not have to be. This is just a sign of immature marketing by
Firefox, and frankly its embarrassing.
It's considered cool these days I suppose to not be offended by the f
word but people such as
On 4/24/2015 3:43 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Currently @mozilla.org aliases and accounts are for original @mozilla.org
folks (a handful of people) and were for sometime used by foundation but
that practice stopped AFAIK otherwise they are assigned anymore.
I had not intended to push mozilla.or
like to create an alias thunderbird-accou...@mozilla.org that
would have an associated Google developer account, that would serve as
the owner of the Thunderbird GMail OAuth2 account.
Or is this a non-issue and I should just file a bug to create the account?
R Kent James
Chair, Thunderbird
14 matches
Mail list logo
