Re: React license and Mozilla/Firefox

On 08/23/2017 05:54 PM, Luis Villa via governance wrote: > This is not a substitute for an analysis specific to Mozilla's particular > needs, but Heather and I have both published analyses of this issue that > may be helpful for Mozillians seeking to learn more about the issue: > > https://heather

Re: Update to Firefox Hello Privacy Notice

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Adam Roach wrote: Google Analytics and Optimizely run on the Hello web client, which is a Mozilla web property. They do not run as part of the built-in client that is a part of Firefox. Thanks Adam for the clarification. It wasn't very clear on the initial ma

Re: Update to Firefox Hello Privacy Notice

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:14 AM, el...@mozilla.com wrote: * **Analytics & Optimization**: If you do not want data about your interaction with Hello to be collected by Google Analytics, you can install the Google Analytics Opt-out Browser Add-on. The add-on keeps your visits anonymous and prohi

Re: Some people on Mozilla Reps have inappropriate City-State

On May 23, 2015 11:40:36 PM GMT+03:00, Mike Hoye wrote: >- Make it a freeform text field and trust our people to exercise their >best judgement as members of the Mozilla community. > >I think we would need a _spectacular_ reason to defer to a >specification >instead of respecting our community

Re: Logging All Public Project IRC Channels

On 01/27/2015 05:55 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > The justification is that we are doing it wrong by defaulting to > closed decision making where not everyone can transparently see all > the discussions we have in the project. > > Great post that talks about this discussion btw and the importance

Re: Mozilla's privacy choices for the "others"

we would value your contribution. I guess the important issue here is that someone may trust Mozilla to keep their data, but not Amazon. In most cases it doesn't make any difference, but I can think of one example (Firefox Accounts) that this may be more significant for many people. -- Nikos Roussos

Re: Planet refresh and proposed policy changes.

ent or topic but instead were created to give a glimpse > into the lives of people who work on a Open Source project. That's not always true. It depends on the project. Many projects demand or suggest you use a specific tag/category feed for their planet. ~nikos -- Nikos Roussos https://mozillians.org/u/comzeradd ___ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Re: Planet refresh and proposed policy changes.

On 12/15/2014 08:21 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > On Dec 15, 2014 10:14 AM, "Leo McArdle" wrote: >> >> On 15/12/14 13:24, Axel Hecht wrote: >>> On 12/13/14 11:07 PM, Larissa Shapiro wrote: I do wonder if Planet could have tags beyond "mozilla" eventually, for topic related streams? I kno

Re: Inconsistency: Tracking users with Google Analytics on pages promoting Privacy

On April 30, 2014 9:47:55 PM EEST, Robert Kaiser wrote: >benoit.les...@gmail.com wrote: >> * The user doesn't know that. Even if >https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1003804 was fixed, nobody >reads all the small print. All they will see is we send their data to >Google, period. > >That's

Re: Persona changes and communications

On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 22:45 +0100, Rubén Martín wrote: > Hi, > > Even this time there was a (at least for me) clear article about the > changes > > on Persona, most people I read or that have pinged me thin

Re: sponsored new tab tiles - please tell me this is a (bad) joke

On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 11:49 +0100, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: > On 2/13/14 1:29 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > I've said this elsethread but let me say it again here: a feature with > > this level of user privacy implications should have been discussed on > > the -privacy mailing list, and ideal

Re: sponsored new tab tiles - please tell me this is a (bad) joke

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 13:15 -0800, Fred Wenzel wrote: > Glyn Moody, a long-time friend of Mozilla in the press, expresses the > Mozilla community's worries very well, go give it a read: > > It seems we are

Re: sponsored new tab tiles - please tell me this is a (bad) joke

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 22:10 -0800, Fred Wenzel wrote: > Daniel, you're intentionally reading my comment out of context: > > You mentioned Adblock+ whose primary purpose it is to get rid of "Times > Square"-style ads. Treating these tiles the same way is what I > cautioned against. Is it? I mean

Re: @mozilla.org email addresses for Mozilla Reps

On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 03:02 -0800, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > Ideally the next steps could be: > > 1. Determine what budget the cost of offering the addresses will come from. > 2. Determine who POC will be (Staff) for creation of addresses. > 3. Community IT Requests Task Force will begin triaging

Re: @mozilla.org email addresses for Mozilla Reps

On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 14:01 +, Gervase Markham wrote: > On 25/10/13 17:31, William Quiviger wrote: > > Yes, the rationale was precisely to have a phased approach and start > > distributing @mozilla.org to staff and Reps only, see how that it > > went and then include everyone once we were confi

Re: @mozilla.org email addresses for Mozilla Reps

On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 08:40 -0700, :mrz wrote: > I also agree there's a revocation process but I'm less clear on how you > determine someone's no longer active. I think David is right. Let's not try to over-complicate things. It's better to have a well-defined policy on who gets a @mozilla.org al