+1
- jst
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Eric Shepherd (Sheppy)
wrote:
> +1 and huzzah!
>
> --
> Eric Shepherd
> Senior Technical Writer
> Mozilla Developer Network
> Blog: https://www.bitstampede.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/sheppy
> Doodle: http://doodle.com/the.sheppy
>
> On Aug 2, 201
I think it's reasonable to leave enough flexibility in this system for
current owners, or even previous owners, to reflect defacto owners in
cases like the one Andrew describes. Noone will argue that Graydon,
who wrote the cycle collector, wasn't the module owner at the time. We
just hadn't made th
None from me.
- jst
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/All says that the XPToolkit module
> has four peers: Boris Zbarsky, Dave Hyatt, Peter Annema, Jan Varga.
>
> I propose that we remove Dave Hyatt and Peter Annema from this
+1
- jst
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> Mark has experience being both a peer and I believe owner of Thunderbird
> I'm confident he will do well as owner of Loop.
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:55 AM Adam Roach wrote:
>
>> Hi, governance.
>>
>> I'm shifting my role a
+1, also, hi Sid! :)
- jst
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:43 PM, wrote:
> Hi Governance people,
>
> Recently I've not been as active in the content security work as I wanted to
> be, so I've decided to step down as the module owner for Content Security[0].
>
> I want to install Christoph Kerschbau
There's been a few discussions around the module system at Mozilla
lately, including the one about the proposed Emeritus Module Owners
module. In some of those conversations questions have been raised
about how up to date our current list of module owners and peers is as
well as how to contact the
This is a great plan IMO (with discussion whenever someone leaves
mozilla). Thanks Mitchell and bsmedberg for pushing for this!
- jst
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Jet Villegas wrote:
> SGTM.
>
> --Jet
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Mitchell Baker
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/21/15 2:17 PM, Jo
SGTM.
- jst
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as work on e10s sandboxing is progressing we're seeing a number of
> things that don't fall under the current platform split, such as
> platform independent infrastructure or policies, so we'd like
> to create
Excellent. I just went ahead and made this official in the wiki!
- jst
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Blake Kaplan wrote:
> Johnny Stenback wrote:
>> After a discussion between Chris Jones, David Anderson, Bill
>> McCloskey, and myself we're proposing that we change the
Howdy,
Chris Jones is currently listed as the owner of the IPC module and has
over the years contributed greatly to not just that module but also
far beyond, and for that I'm forever thankful. Chris is however no
longer in a position where he can effectively bear that ownership.
After a discussio
I full expect that the vast majority of our irc channels are already
logged, some obviously, others maybe a bit less so. Making the fact
that everything that's said on our irc channels is public official and
known seems like a good thing to me.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wr
Sounds great to me! +1
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> Over the past year, a growing team of developers has been involved in
> developing a voice and video collaboration system that is integrated into
> the Firefox desktop browser as well as a compatible Firefox OS client.
>
Agreed, sounds good to me as well. Thanks!
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> This sounds good to me; another de-facto module to recognize in the de-jure
> system. Thanks,
>
> /be
>
> Gavin Sharp wrote:
>>
>> Currently, the process of obtaining Mozilla commit access is driven
12 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/18/2014 8:20 PM, Johnny Stenback wrote:
>>>
>>> We have the following modules listed on our modules page:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Core#Java_APIs_for_DOM
>>> https://wiki.mozi
We have the following modules listed on our modules page:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Core#Java_APIs_for_DOM
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Core#Java_APIs_to_WebShell
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Core#Java_Stubs
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Core#Java_to_XPCOM_Bridge
https://wiki.moz
I've heard zero objections to this plan, so I just made this change in
the wiki.
Cheers,
Johnny
On 05/29/2014 01:48 PM, Johnny Stenback wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Andrew McCright brought to my attention that the currently listed owner
> for the XPIDL module is Dave Bradley (through
Hey guys,
Andrew McCright brought to my attention that the currently listed owner
for the XPIDL module is Dave Bradley (through an email address that
currently bounces), who has not been able to actively contribute to the
module for a number of years at this point. I personally reached out to
Davi
On 02/07/2014 03:10 PM, Garrett Robinson wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 02:33 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
>> Safe Browsing has typically been considered its own toolkit
>> sub-module, and isn't a "content security policy" the same way CSP/MCB
>> are. I don't really have any objection to grouping it with the oth
> On 9/5/12 2:53 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Johnny Stenback wrote:
>>> The Cycle Collector currently lives as part of the XPCOM module, but the
>>> XPCOM module owners/peers are not the people who do the majority of the
>>> wor
The Cycle Collector currently lives as part of the XPCOM module, but the
XPCOM module owners/peers are not the people who do the majority of the
work on the Cycle Collector. Also, the people who do the majority of
the work are *not* XPCOM owners/peers, which makes it unclear who should
review Cycle
20 matches
Mail list logo
