Hello all,
the "Sandboxing - Linux & B2G" module currently has Julian Hector as the
owner. Julian has moved on to other security work outside Mozilla and is
no longer really available for work on it. In reality, the majority of
recent work in this module has been carried out by Jed Davis and mysel
On 26/04/2017 10:59, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 25/04/17 16:36, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>> - Remove Ryan Kelly from Peers
>
> Don't forget to make him a peer emeritus, unless there's some reason
> not to.
If I understood Francois correctly, he sai
Hi all,
we plan to make the following changes to the URL Classifier module
(covering SafeBrowsing and Tracking Protection), to properly reflect
current development activity:
Owner:
- Move Francois Marier to Owner (client)
- Move Luke Crouch to Owner (server)
Peers:
- Move Gian-Carlo Pascutto to
Hi all,
the owners for ImageLib are listed as:
Owner: Seth Fowler
Peer(s): Brian Bondy, Jeff Muizelaar, Justin Lebar, Timothy Nikkel
Of these 5 people, at least 3 were former employees that no longer work
for us. Brian left to work on Brave and Justin is doing LLVM GPU work at
Google. I don't kn
Hi all,
a few months ago we removed some owners & peers from the Sandboxing
submodels as people retired or moved on the other projects. Meanwhile
several other people have been worked in and are actively contributing
and taking effective ownership to these modules.
To reflect reality, I'd propose
ones fall under that.
Name: Sandboxing
Owner: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Peers: Bob Owen (Win), Aaron Klotz, Tim Abraldes, Jed Davis (Linux/B2G),
Guillaume Destuynder, Benjamin Smedberg
Source Dir(s): security/sandbox
Bugzilla Components: Core::Security: Process Sandboxing
URL:https://wiki.mozil
On 10/07/2015 16:27, Francois Marier wrote:
>> Discussion Group:mozilla.dev.platform
>
> Would mozilla.dev.security be more appropriate?
There's some signs that it will get users outside of security features,
so maybe not.
--
GCP
___
governance m
On 09-07-15 17:57, Mike Connor wrote:
> So, my main question/concern is that you're combining the server and
> the client code.
I'm not doing this. It is already the case under Tracking Protection and
this part doesn't change.
> Can either of the Ryans review Gecko code? (They're
> smart people
ith Tracking Protection into a new module, URL Classifier, and set the
owners/peers to the people actually working on it.
Name: URL Classifier
Description: Database and list-based classification of URL resources,
such as Tracking Protection and SafeBrowsing.
Owner: Gian-Carlo Pascutto, Ryan Tilder
On 9/06/2015 16:24, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
> On 09/06/2015 14:47, snafumatt...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Adblock plus and ublock origin are by far the most popular add-ons for
>> Firefox. Will you be implementing those by default, too?
>
> Part of the effect of these add-ons (in terms of not being track
On 9/06/2015 15:05, commentsab...@riseup.net wrote:
> Mozilla was
> highly criticized and there's still reason to do so regarding “safe
> browsing” when you know that “[...] existing cookies you have from
> google.com, our list provider, may also be sent.” [2]
>
> [2]
> https://support.mozilla.org
On 12-12-14 13:28, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
> On 11/12/2014, 17:43, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Rather than guessing what mozilla may or may not do based on the
>> comments of someone that is not part of the mozilla community, it'd be
>> better to try to get some facts.
>
> It seems to me that's what th
On 24/07/2014 14:31, Rubén Martín wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Next Firefox version is supposed to ask for signature verification on files
> that are not signed by a known publisher.
FYI the remote lookup part of this feature has been postponed, likely to
around Firefox ~35. There were some concerns over
On 23/08/2014 18:23, Chris Ilias wrote:
>> ...and, because of that, so long as it is non-fingerprintable. For
>> instance, if there is one user in Brunei, we cannot share that
>> data.
>>
>> Perhaps it would be good to chat with Alex Fowler and get his thoughts.
>
> Could you explain that in fur
On 07/26/2014 02:54 AM, Chris Peterson wrote:
> Do Google's terms of service allow Mozilla to insert an anonymizing
> (and possibly caching) proxy server between Firefox users and
> Google's Safe Browsing service? How many requests per second would it
> need to handle?
https://code.google.com/p/ch
On 07/28/2014 01:23 PM, Rubén Martín wrote:
> Reading this I assume that right now we are NOT sending urls to google
> in any case except we hit a positive on the blocking list.
>
> My question is if we are going to do the same for downloads in Firefox
> 32 or this is going to change.
See Gavin
16 matches
Mail list logo
