On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Paul Fernhout
> wrote:
>> The Mozilla mission page says, at the top, "We're building a better
>> Internet", but then says lower down, "Our mission is to promote openness,
>> innovation & opportunity on th
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Andrew Sutherland
wrote:
> An important question that falls out from all of this is and your
> original question is: which is more important? Mail user agency or
> Thunderbird the product, especially if there are serious opportunity
> costs related to Thunderbird?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Mitchell Baker wrote:
> 7. Some Mozillians are eager to see Mozilla support community-managed
> projects within our main development efforts. I am also sympathetic to this
> view, with a key precondition. Community-managed projects that make the
> main effort l
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> This problem was present in the original, but: this implies that there's
> a trade-off between safety and user experience. I don't think that's so
> - you can have very usable, very privacy-respecting software. The
> difficult tradeoff is
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Rubén Martín
wrote:
> Probably it was me, but the article wording was too complex and didn't
> summarize what Boris wrote:
> * Not shipping it by default (the CDM module).
> * Requiring explicit user content before downloading the CDM.
> * Insisting on a CDM
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
> There was a town hall about this earlier today. Did the invite not reach
> you? A lot of this was already discussed.
I only received an email from Brian King ~3h ago, via Reps-General.
IIRC there was no Mozillians-wide email.
Cheers,
Dir
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Majken Connor wrote:
> I added some questions for the town hall to the moderator, but I have a
> thought that is not a question and won't fit into 140 char anyway.
Mitchell addressed a bunch of these posts in a blog post:
https://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2014/02/
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-57618750-92/mozilla-to-sell-new-tab-page-ads-in-firefox/
This doesn't seem actually very negative, as I read it. Am I reading
it that differently?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Rubén Martín
wrote:
> I had to read all the messages twice to understand the problem.
Could you please provide a little more context?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lis
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Majken Connor wrote:
> then lets rein the discussion back in to talking about just emails. Adding
> on the constraint of emails also denoting the trusted group is going to
> delay emails going out even longer and I don't think we need to say that
> everyone who has
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:26 PM, David Bruant wrote:
> This proposal doesn't explain the problem it tries to solve (and I'm
> pointing that because it's not really clear to me what problem that is).
> Among other things, the proposal doesn't explain why the Reps program isn't
> sufficient to descr
I like it, a lot!
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Fred Wenzel wrote:
> I'd like to find a sufficient answer to this point to ensure the
> proposed system will actually be useful and not go unused in favor of
> employees-all for fear of missing important people when announcing
> things.
I agree
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Majken Connor wrote:
> I also want to suggest maybe there needs to be a time period before a person
> can vouch for new members? I think this is also normal in this type of trust
> system and it also minimizes the damage to the trust structure if someone
> makes it
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Reed Loden wrote:
> The Planet team has always felt that Planet is meant to encompass
> whatever people wish to share from their blogs, not just Mozilla stuff.
> We want people in the community to showcase their lives, not just their
> Mozilla work. While most peop
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> At the Festival, I was encouraged to elaborate on this. I've talked
> about my idea elsewhere, but here it is again:
>
> There are now at least two reasons we need to define a subset of
> Mozillians who are trusted by the community.
>
> The
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Reed Loden wrote:
> The slow point for me has always been writing the blog post. I hate
> doing that part. The other part (actually adding the blog to planet) is
> really easy.
>
> Perhaps we could have a monthly blog post of new arrivals but have quick
> additions
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Pascal Chevrel wrote:
> In summary, do we know where the bottleneck is? Is adding the feed
> technically painful? Is the person/people in charge of responding to
> such requests not receiveing their bugmail (maybe because they disabled
> email noifications in their
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Taras Glek wrote:
> The planet is our main venue for discussing our work in the open, we should
> treat it with more care. I think it's pretty clear that the slow process of
> getting people on planet is causing more harm than good(how many people DID
> NOT get ap
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> timeanddate.com is OK for a single meeting, but what we really want is a
> URL which encodes a meeting sequence. So the URL doesn't have to change
> each week. So you would have e.g.:
>
> http://time.mozilla.org/?t=0830&tz=America/Los_Ange
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:27 PM, wrote:
> * Capture Mozilla: This is an effort to collect information about Mozilla
> that very often exists only in people's heads right now and put it into
> videos that can be distributed broadly across the project.
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Capture_Mozilla
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Axel Hecht wrote:
> 1) It's one of the best mozilla traditions to recognize people with leader
> roles once they've led.
...
> 2) People only work well as long as they're intrinsically motivated.
...
> 3) Volunteers do what's right and within their power
Really
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Ben Hearsum wrote:
> I'm going to refrain from saying anything else because I realized that
> unless I can say something with authority (which I can't), I can only
> cause confusion. I would recommend taking this conversation to #b2g or
> another place with the peo
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Ben Hearsum wrote:
> With that said though, what makes you think that "most devices" won't
> get updates? AFAIK 99% or more of our devices will be sold through a
> telco... (again, I'm not authoritative on this, it's merely my own
> understanding).
Experience with
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Ben Hearsum wrote:
> It's worth noting that Mozilla is not going to be running the update
> servers for FxOS. I'm 99% sure it's the telcos that will be, but it's
> possible that it may be the manufacturer.
So there will effectively be no (or a single) updates to g
24 matches
Mail list logo
