Re: Remove Pocket Integration from Firefox

In , David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: > On 15/12/15 18:27, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > > I agree and it's disappointing when the first thread on Pocket was > > discussed here Mozilla said there was no money deal to integrate > > pocket b

Re: Remove Pocket Integration from Firefox

In , mehmetaer...@gmail.com wrote: > Please reopen bug #1172126. Making a bug report dependent on a > conversation on external & proprietary Google Groups is against > Mozilla Manifesto (#8, primacy of transparent community-based > pr

Re: Is Mozilla slow-walking this supposedly "open dialogue" forum?

In , Jay Garcia wrote: > Joe, I have been posting to this group for a long time directly to the > server and posts are not held, posted immediately. I am not subscribed > to the list. In addition to what others have said, I believe

Re: Is Mozilla slow-walking this supposedly "open dialogue" forum?

In , Zeev Wurman wrote: > I have posted a response on Friday morning (before 10 am PDT), and it > has not been posted yet. > > Just wondering. It got through moderation today. Partial headers: Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 09:54:01 -07

Re: Updated FAQ on Brendan's resignation

In , JoeS wrote: > On 4/11/2014 2:54 PM, Gervase Markham wrote: > > In case it makes a difference, that quote was misattributed. Reid > > Hoffman said that, not Mitchell. (She was somewhat upset that it was > > misattributed.) > >

Re: First Mozilla, Now Dropbox...who's next in the for lack of a better word, Anschluss?

In , walter.a.robe...@gmail.com wrote: > Those who would intimidate organizations, such as Mozilla and now > DropBox and their people, should be told, just as the Klan was told, > there is no place in our world for your style of diplo

Re: "Governed by meritocracy"?

In , Gervase Markham wrote: > On 08/04/14 15:23, Michael Connor wrote: > > The storm last week was orders of magnitude bigger > > I don't know how these things are measured, but my experience is that > that's not true at all. I

Re: Back to IE and Microsoft - Mozilla Intolerance

In , Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 4/7/14 11:19 PM, jenniferle...@gmail.com wrote: > > It's in the FAQ clear as day and I quote: > > > > "A: No. In fact, Board members and senior executives tried to get > > Brendan to stay at Mozilla in

Re: Committed to Diversity????

In , Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Yeah, http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/contact/spaces/ (which is where > the "Contact Us" link seems to go to) seems to be pretty focused on > the Mozilla Spaces, not on contacting the project leadership. :(

Re: It's not so much about "diversity" but now about "trust"

In , jenniferle...@gmail.com wrote: > 4. If an outside right-wing Christian pro-life group had organized a > highly visible protest against a Mozilla CEO who had donated heavily > to Planned Parenthood (and not just $1000 to Prop 8 ye

Re: Back to IE and Microsoft - Mozilla Intolerance

In , Jorge Villalobos wrote: > On 4/4/14, 11:01 AM, ejdavis2...@gmail.com wrote: > > The truly intolerant Board members had already > > resigned when Mr Eich was appointed CEO. Are those intolerant Board > > members going to be reins

Re: The condescending "It seems, however, that you were misinformed" reply

In , hudginsem...@gmail.com wrote: > I would guess that most of the individuals posting comments here can > differentiate between getting fired, negotiating an exit, being > pressured and not being supported. Maybe, and maybe reading

Re: Persona changes and communications

In , Jb Piacentino wrote: > In the case of Thunderbird, we, as a community, spent about 8 months > discussing the best options for the product moving forward. There was > indeed the notion of 'the resources we can spare', but more