On 04/12/2015 06:32, Douglas Turner wrote:
> Hey Daniel,
Hi my friend!
> a. all the underlying technologies of Thunderbird's world (XPCOM, XUL,
>XBL, XUL-based add-ons) are on the verge of being deprecated. Is the
>announced move a way to decouple faster, as it seems reading
Hey Daniel,
Lots of questions; let me try. Keep in mind that there are plenty of
points of views at Mozilla. These are my opinions which are influenced by
the gecko developers I work with and the Firefox teams that I support.
Some of this will feel like tit for tat, my intent is only to address
Thanks for the suggestion! We'll follow up.
mitchell
On 12/3/15 7:57 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
I understand that Thunderbird's future is currently under discussion and
pretty much open.
If it is decided to move Thunderbird out of Mozilla, I'd like to suggest
to reach out to The Document Fo
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:37 PM, R Kent James wrote:
> In my dreams though, I sometimes imagine a world in which
> Thunderbird, Postbox, N1, and Gaia Email all decide to work together to make
> a common, killer communication client.
N1 is GPLv3 like GPG, so my licensing comment applies to using co
On 12/3/2015 8:09 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
I'm just going to add that Mitchell's email while we u see stand what she
said I think the messaging could have been different. I'm unsure if PR was
consulted but the end result has been very negative media for Thunderbird
as a project and Mozilla acr
On 03/12/2015 16:09, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
I'm just going to add that Mitchell's email while we u see stand what she
said I think the messaging could have been different. I'm unsure if PR was
consulted
Did you consult PR before you posted your response?
but the end result has been very nega
There is always a back-and-forth
between how much the leadership announces a plan and how much
there is a community-based process, with early statements of
what's in the air and the ability for those who are interested
and can get involved in a productive way to
I'm just going to add that Mitchell's email while we u see stand what she
said I think the messaging could have been different. I'm unsure if PR was
consulted but the end result has been very negative media for Thunderbird
as a project and Mozilla across media in all countries.
I don't even know w
I understand that Thunderbird's future is currently under discussion and
pretty much open.
If it is decided to move Thunderbird out of Mozilla, I'd like to suggest
to reach out to The Document Foundation and ask if they are interested.
It seems to me that Thunderbird might be a good addition to th
On 12/3/2015 4:01 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Andrew Sutherland
wrote:
2) When you have addressed the technical debt, you potentially are left
with something that is not the same product that Thunderbird was to
begin with[1]. (:rkent's post at
https://mail.mozilla.
Mitchell,
Daniel has some really great questions.
Can they be answered as well?
Thanks
Mike
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Andrew Sutherland
wrote:
> 2) When you have addressed the technical debt, you potentially are left
> with something that is not the same product that Thunderbird was to
> begin with[1]. (:rkent's post at
> https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/tb-planning/2015-Septemb
12 matches
Mail list logo
