Do you mind sharing the how-to you used for mapTiler?
Thanks
Atenciosamente
--
Mauro Marchiori Neto
email: mauron...@gmail.com
*cel: 19 9722.1600*
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Tali Aviram wrote:
> hi, thanks for answering
> I don't use clustering cause I didn't knew how to use it ,
> I s
Tnx for answering ,
I did use eventually raster tiles by mapTiler
because on FT tables in world zoom level (zoom =2) it show point not
polygons, do you know something about it?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Barry Hunter wrote:
> Probably rendering raster tiles would be the most performant
>
>
hi, thanks for answering
I don't use clustering cause I didn't knew how to use it ,
I saw in Google some code on this not clear issue.
for now I used mapTiler to load raster on google tiles it amazingly quick
but it wouldn't be enough when I will need the info window.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5
Did you try PolyGonzo? https://code.google.com/p/polygonzo/
I havent been able to fully understand it (there is a python script with no
docs that transforms the georeferenced shp file into json files) but i'm
facing the same issue, except on my case i have about 5000+ polygons..they
show up fine,
Probably rendering raster tiles would be the most performant
You could use Fusion Tables, to do the heavy lifting for you
http://support.google.com/fusiontables/answer/2571232?hl=en
import all your data into a FT, and use the inbuilt API to render the FT on
your map.
It can cope with thousands o
hello ,
I have site of atlas with world maps also.
when polygon's layer is up to 200 polys, I brings them encoded from sql
server (by JSON) by groups of 20 and its fine.
now, I have layer with 2000 polys cover world's map , I've reduce amount of
vertexes and the polygon and very simplify.
The l
