On Aug 21, 4:17 pm, ppops wrote:
> Working version -http://www.irun.org.au/runs/?fuseAction=viewRun&mapID=79
Your polyline goes over water. Is that just due to lack of resolution
in your input data? You seem to have lots of detail at the end.
-- Larry
>
> On Aug 18, 11:25 pm, ppops wrote:
Working version - http://www.irun.org.au/runs/?fuseAction=viewRun&mapID=79
On Aug 18, 11:25 pm, ppops wrote:
> Thanks, I understand how to fix this issue now.
>
> I will fix tomorrow and post a working version.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Paul.
>
> On Aug 18, 10:52 pm, "geocode...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
>
>
Thanks, I understand how to fix this issue now.
I will fix tomorrow and post a working version.
Cheers.
Paul.
On Aug 18, 10:52 pm, "geocode...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> On Aug 17, 10:53 pm, ppops wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >http://www.irun.org.au/runs/?fuseAction=viewRun&mapID=79
>
> > For some reason
On Aug 17, 10:53 pm, ppops wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://www.irun.org.au/runs/?fuseAction=viewRun&mapID=79
>
> For some reason the polyline doesn't follow the markers exactly.
>
> There are roughly 300-400 markers, would this be an issue?
Not if you used the same coordinates for the markers and the
pol
