This has now been fixed (at least in MarkerClustererPlus).
See https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/73571522 for the suggestion that
led to a successful workaround.
On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 2:35:39 PM UTC-8, Arun Wilson wrote:
>
> Google maps Custom overlay click event is not working in mob
dern
> correct perspective view which you can see in StreetView when viewing on
> google maps.
>
> Is there any way to resolve this? i.e. same functionality with the correct
> perspective render of StreetView panorama?
>
> Thanks in advance! And great work!!
>
> Al
I just took a look at the basic MarkerWithLabel example and the labels
print fine on a Mac with Safari, Chrome, and Firefox.
Check the CSS for your labels; perhaps you specified display: none; in a
print media selector.
Gary
On Thursday, May 31, 2012 3:48:40 AM UTC-7, dbrb2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
This behavior only occurs with v=3. It does not occur with v=3.6.
I haven't seen any release notes for a 3.7 refresh since late last
year, but something has definitely changed quite recently.
On Feb 1, 2:24 pm, Gary Little wrote:
> The latest version of the Google Maps implementation
The latest version of the Google Maps implementation seems to have
changed recently causing problems with events during zoom operations.
I have markers that have listeners for mouseover and mouseout events.
On mouseover a box appears showing information about the marker; on
mouseout the box is hid
It worked fine for me after I fixed three typos: change "," to ";" at
end of lines 1, 2, and also the 2nd to last line. You've also got an
extraneous comma at the end of the height: "auto" line which will
causes problems with some browsers.
Gary
On Jan 27, 2:19 pm, velomash wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
Does anyone know the CSS style that is now applied to the Google
copyright notice in the lower right corner of the map? The text seems
to be a shade of gray with a shade of white being used for the
background. I want to replicate the look with another copyright notice
I'm adding to my map.
--
You
Harman,
Try using the batchSizeIE parameter. It's use is covered in the
MarkerClustererPlus reference.
Rendering this many markers will still be very slow but by setting
batchSizeIE appropriately you can probably avoid the error message.
Gary
On Dec 14, 10:33 pm, meenu bhatti wrote:
> Hi All,
Note: this issue was solved over on the utilities forum -- it is
important to use the latest version (1.1.9) of InfoBox.
On Nov 30, 4:51 am, Geoff Schultz
wrote:
> While I wait for my membership in the Google Maps Utility Library group to
> get approved, I'll ask this question here.
>
> Has anyon
Marcelo,
You're probably right. Now I'm wondering why I bothered to pay extra
for the fixed IP address since it may not be unique to me.
Gary
On Nov 29, 3:29 pm, Marcelo wrote:
> On Nov 29, 4:24 pm, Gary Little wrote:
>
> > It turns out I have a dedicated IP add
It turns out I have a dedicated IP address so I shouldn't be penalized
by others who share the server who are making requests.
Gary
On Nov 29, 1:44 pm, Andrew Leach wrote:
> On 29 November 2011 21:38, Gary Little wrote:
>
> > When I request a geocoding operation from my se
Yes, it fails on the very first request. I'm using some code that
Google provided some time ago -- each time a request fails I delay an
additional 10 microseconds (100 milliseconds) before making the
next request.
On Nov 29, 2:30 pm, MymsMan wrote:
> How many requests are you attempting? does
When I request a geocoding operation from my server (using a PHP
script) I always get an OVER_QUERY_LIMIT error. Not sure why because I
certainly don't make very many such requests. Does anyone have any
idea of what's going on? I'm on one of those shared servers from a web
hoster, could it be that
I just checked Chrome, OmniWeb, and Opera (all on Mac) and they work
as well.
Only Safari is problematic. I'm running v 5.0.5.
Gary
On Nov 21, 10:23 pm, Gary Little wrote:
> Mac OS X 10.6.8 / Safari
>
> I just tried Firefox 7.0.1... and it works!
>
> So it looks like it is
Mac OS X 10.6.8 / Safari
I just tried Firefox 7.0.1... and it works!
So it looks like it is something to do with Safari.
On Nov 21, 9:38 pm, "Enoch Lau (Google Employee)"
wrote:
> I don't see the behavior you describe - for both editable polygons and
> non-editable circles, when I click the clu
Go to http://www.luxcentral.com/bug/bug10.html
1. Click the polygon tool in the shape toolbar on the map (it's the
only tool with editable set to true)
2. Draw a polygon around the cluster icon.
3. Click the hand tool in the shape toolbar.
4. Click the cluster icon -- nothing happens.
5. Reloa
I've noticed that if you make a polygon editable (using the new 3.7
capability) and the polygon encloses a MarkerClusterer icon, the
MarkerClusterer icon does not get click events. This is not good,
since clicking the icon is the quick way to zoom the map in and see
the individual markers.
Anyone
Could you post the CSS styles for the new visual style of the default
controls so that I can make my own visual controls look similar?
On Nov 15, 6:47 pm, "Chris Broadfoot (Google Employee)"
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We recently released a new minor version of the Maps API. This means
> that shortly,
See
http://googlegeodevelopers.blogspot.com/2011/11/make-your-map-interactive-with-shape.html
On Nov 15, 9:27 am, Gary Little wrote:
> I've figured out how to make the custom area polygons editable on my
> interactive real estate map and it works great! The key is to add
> lis
I've figured out how to make the custom area polygons editable on my
interactive real estate map and it works great! The key is to add
listeners for the insert_at, remove_at, and set_at events of the path
of the polygon. That's where you would save the new vertices of the
polygon.
Gary
On Nov
MarkerClustererPlus has an option (batchSizeIE) that can be used to
avoid timeout errors when clustering a very large number of markers
when using Internet Explorer. All other browsers should be able to
handle 10-20K markers with no problem. IE will be very slow in
creating the clusters, however.
The DragZoom library has this capability but it works with V2 only, it
was never ported to V3.
The KeyDragZoom library (available for both V2 and V3), initially
designed to provide a drag zoom capability triggered by holding down a
hot key (with no UI controls required), but later enhanced to allo
See
http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2011/09/refocused-design-evolution-continued.html
Google seems very proud of some tweaks to the UI of its main Google
map. Any idea why these elements are not used by default when creating
custom Google maps using V3 of the API?
I would like to see some con
See http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3651
On Sep 29, 3:55 am, Petermilad wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I created a new cluster and set some markers to it, set the default
> map zoom level to 2 and the centre to (0,0). just to mention something
> about the map zoom level 2 whic
See http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3651
Try setting v=3.5 when loading the Google Maps API.
On Sep 29, 2:47 am, Petermilad wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have this issue which I load the map centred at (0,0), create a new
> cluster then markers to this cluster. the thing i
See http://code.google.com/p/google-maps-utility-library-v3/issues/detail?id=129
Beginning recently, presumably triggered by a change in one of the
nightly releases, markers and/or their associated labels are not being
positioned property -- but only when using certain browsers -- when
using the M
There's a syntax error in the code for your map that uses InfoBox. On
the line after
,width: "180px"
there is an extraneous } on a line by itself. It needs to be removed.
Gary
On Sep 1, 11:02 am, ir261273 wrote:
> Hi, I wonder whether someone may be able to help me please with an
>
People may also want to turn off "poi.medical" to prevent pharmacies
-- which I feel are more like businesses than medical facilities --
from being displayed (of course this would also affect hospitals).
On Aug 24, 1:12 am, Chris Broadfoot wrote:
> Hi, you can disable the business icons by making
Noli,
Your request is a bit off topic, but here are two examples:
http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/infobox/examples/
On Aug 24, 7:12 pm, Noli Sicad wrote:
> On 8/24/11, Noli Sicad wrote:
>
> > Do you have simple example illustrating how to use this infobox?
>
> > T
The cursor change issue has now been fixed in the trunk version
(1.1.8) of InfoBox that I posted earlier today:
http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/infobox/src/infobox.js
On Aug 24, 9:58 am, Gary Little wrote:
> Pil,
>
> The cursor change issue seems to be
:
http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/infobox/src/infobox.js
Gary
On Aug 24, 6:07 pm, Gary Little wrote:
> Changing z-index should make no difference if the marker's mouseTarget
> pane is different from the floatPane. It's almost as if the mouse
> target
ps API is doing.
>
> http://www.wolfpil.de/normal-z-index.html
>
> ~
>
> On Aug 24, 7:19 pm, Gary Little wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have noticed that google.maps.InfoWindow correctly prevents the
> > cursor from changing to a pointer when the mouse rolls over a
&g
I have noticed that google.maps.InfoWindow correctly prevents the
cursor from changing to a pointer when the mouse rolls over a
clickable marker (including the new POI markers) covered by the
InfoWindow.
I am trying to mimic this same behavior in my InfoBox class and can't
figure out how to do it.
which is - in my eyes - absolutely redundant.
>
> [1] Because this doesn't happen in the bug report example
>
> http://www.luxcentral.com/bug/infowindow-bug.html
>
> even when applying a workaround.
>
> On Aug 24, 5:22 pm, Gary Little wrote:
>
>
>
> > Se
See Issue 3573
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3573
On Aug 24, 7:55 am, Gary Little wrote:
> Rob,
>
> OK, I've now figured this out. It turns out the problem occurs when
> using markers that have the optimized property set to true -- and with
>
Rob,
OK, I've now figured this out. It turns out the problem occurs when
using markers that have the optimized property set to true -- and with
current versions of Google Maps API the default setting is true. In
this situation Google uses a canvas to render markers and it seems
this is interfering
I see the problem. I've tried to create a simple test case to
reproduce it using one of the InfoBox examples but it works correctly.
Could you create a minimal test case to illustrate the problem?
There's something odd here that I can't quite put my finger on.
Gary
On Aug 22, 7:40 am, RobRoyAus
It can probably handle it, though you may not be satisfied the
performance, even with a fast browser. IE would be totally unusable.
On Aug 23, 9:49 am, Al Black wrote:
> Gary, in the example MarkerClustererPlus goes up to 1000 markers no sweat -
> would it be able to handle large numbers like 50,
evel so I can try it myself.
>
> Chris
>
> --http://twitter.com/broady
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Gary Little wrote:
> > ... after some experimentation I've found that even after setting the
> > visibility of poi.business labels to "off&qu
First of all, performance will be very slow when handling this number
of markers. I would guess that Internet Explorer, the slowest of the
browsers, would be totally unusable.
To answer your question: MarkerClusterer does not trigger events when
it starts (and ends) clustering.
However, MarkerClu
abels are still
"off" by default in 3.6 and I'm seeing some clickable business icons
because of a bug or ???
On Aug 19, 7:36 am, Gary Little wrote:
> What are the criteria for determining which clickable business icons
> are shown on the base map? In the downtown core of my to
What are the criteria for determining which clickable business icons
are shown on the base map? In the downtown core of my town, only two
businesses are shown (both are pharmacies); there are no restaurants,
banks, grocery stories, coffee shops, etc. Not very useful.
Gary
On Aug 16, 6:53 pm, Chri
There is no documented way to programmatically hide a cluster other
than by using the minimumClusterSize property.
Barry could probably get the desired effect by using
MarkerClustererPlus (an enhanced version of MarkerClusterer), however.
What you would do is hide markers that don't meet your crit
Yes, that's how to do it: add a handler for the map's "zoom_changed"
event then change the visibility of your polygons depending on the
current zoom level. I do something like this for hiding labels at low
zoom levels and showing them when the map is zoomed in beyond a
threshold value.
On Aug 3, 1
The marker clusterer places cluster icons in the overlayMouseTarget
pane which is "above" the overlayImage pane where markers reside.
That's why changing z-indexes doesn't affect the ordering: cluster
icons always appear above markers.
I believe the overlayMouseTarget pane was probably chosen to m
>From the V2 Reference:
"Note: The Google Maps Javascript API Version 2 has been officially
deprecated as of May 19, 2010. The V2 API will continue to work as per
our deprecation policy, but we encourage you to migrate your code to
version 3 of the Maps Javascript API"
On Aug 1, 8:09 am, franklin
I've got a clickable fusion table with 15,000 polygons overlaid on my
map. I have a click handler to display a dialog box when any of these
polygons is clicked.
When the user double clicks on a polygon, the map zooms in one level
(I think this is done by the Google fusion layer code) then the
"cli
Works for me with Safari 5.0.5/Mac on a MacBook Pro with Mac OS X
10.6.7.
Gary
On Jun 5, 3:21 pm, kfa1983 wrote:
> Here's a link where you can see it in action:
>
> http://www.oneyez.com/conf/13954c10d97d93d4a1b4baab9cbb839bbe002dd9
>
> Thanks in advance!! ^^
--
You received this message becau
You can also create map labels using the InfoBox class in the V3
utilities library:
http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/tags/infobox/1.1.5/
These labels don't use so if you have a lot of labels on the
map performance may not be as fast as with Map Label. On the other
hand, i
Chris, Luke,
What happens when you try to use this library with a browser that does
not support ? Does it gracefully switch to using a different
technique, fail, or...?
Gary
On May 24, 12:05 am, Chris Broadfoot wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few of you who had watched my Google I/O talk* were wondering
Chris,
Neat bindTo trick! No need to set up an event listener... Saved me
several lines of code.
Gary
On May 25, 2:59 am, Chris Broadfoot wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Johannes Schill
> wrote:
>
> > are being included in the result. Maybe my default bounds are bad in
> > my javascri
Be sure to include the InfoBox library before using it. That is,
include the following file in a script tag:
http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/tags/infobox/1.1.5/src/infobox.js
When you attach an InfoBox to the map (with open) it appears on the
map by default. You can then
I'm using Safari 5.0.5/Mac and it works as expected.
On May 11, 8:07 am, pablovn wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been more specific about what is not working. On
> firefox, chrome and IE I get the map. On Safari 5.0.5, I get nothing, a
> blank screen.
--
You received this message because you ar
In your mouseover listener, you're going to have to change the content
of the InfoBox based on which marker is being moused over. Use the
setContent function of the InfoBox class.
Gary
On Apr 20, 7:11 am, pontusw wrote:
> Hi, I'm new to the Google Maps Api and Javascript is not my preferred codi
This is not currently possible with KeyDragZoom. The visual control
must appear on the surface of the map.
Gary
On Apr 19, 3:13 am, Alessio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the extension for the v2 api I was able to activate the dragzoom
> with a normal html button, using a function in the onclick attribute
InfoBox has a setContent method for changing the content and a
setPosition method for changing the position.
So in your click handler for a marker you can get the position of the
marker (google.maps.Marker.getPosition()), then pass the result on to
the InfoBox to reposition it at the marker clicke
You can use the infobox.js library to add labels to V3 maps:
http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/tags/infobox/1.1.5/
One of the examples shows exactly how to do it.
On Apr 6, 11:07 am, iTraceDesigns
wrote:
> How can I add extra labels to my maps? I'm specifically talking a
The current version of KeyDragZoom lets you activate a drag zoom not
only from the keyboard but also by clicking a visual control. Read the
documentation at
http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/tags/keydragzoom/2.0.5/docs/reference.html
On Apr 5, 10:06 am, Howard P wrote:
> I
This release is considerably slower than v3.3 when it comes to
updating map tiles. With 3.3, when I pan a map I rarely see a blank
spot while the API fetches and displays a new tile. With 3.4 I see
these blanks spots all the time and it takes a second or two to
update.
Gary
On Mar 24, 7:58 am, "C
Have you tried using the KeyDragZoom utility?
See http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/tags/keydragzoom/
Gary
On Mar 21, 3:42 am, Xenya wrote:
> Hello,
> the original Google Map offers the feature "Drag 'n' Zoom". I want to use it
> at my own page with googlemaps. In the API
The MarkerWithLabel utility library uses the overlayMouseTarget pane.
You can retrieve the source code at
http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/markerwithlabel/
Gary
On Mar 18, 11:36 pm, sq wang wrote:
> I am trying to add my layer which can catch the click event. So I f
Chris,
Note this Safari disappearing marker bug with V3.4 when marker
optimization is off:
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3162
Gary
On Mar 17, 12:07 am, "Chris Broadfoot (Google Employee)"
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today we pushed a new version of the API. This version b
Simon:
I tried your sample and I also observe the problem you're describing.
I added an optimized: false parameter to each marker and everything
now works as expected!
Definitely a bug -- zindex of draggable markers isn't behaving as
expected when optimized is true (the new default).
Gary
On M
I've now seen this even with non-draggable markers and have created a
test case. See:
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3162
Gary
On Mar 12, 4:45 pm, Gary Little wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm experiencing an odd situation which I believe is unique toSafari
See bug report at
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3162
On Mar 18, 11:34 am, Gary Little wrote:
> Chris:
>
> After further analysis... optimized: false doesn't work reliably with
> Safari/Mac (entire markers sometimes go missing). Seems to be OK with
Chris:
After further analysis... optimized: false doesn't work reliably with
Safari/Mac (entire markers sometimes go missing). Seems to be OK with
every other Mac browser. Will start a new thread to discuss.
Gary
On Mar 18, 9:42 am, Gary Little wrote:
> Chris:
>
> Setting op
Chris:
Setting optimized: false seems to have solved my problem since I was
already doing everything else you suggested. Thanks.
Now I wish I could set optimized: true but for that I need an official
way to access the internal z-indexes of the marker.
(This is part of my work on MarkerWithLabel
Chris,
I too have been noticing unexpected problems in z ordering with V3.4,
not sure if it's related to this problem, but it might be.
In my case, I'm attempting to set the z-index of an OverlayView object
based on the current z-index of an associated Marker so I can order
them properly relative
this. Feel free to file a external one too.
>
> -- Luke
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Gary Little wrote:
> > It would be nice to have a way to prevent the overview map control
> > from appearing when the map is printed. This could be done by
> > suppor
It would be nice to have a way to prevent the overview map control
from appearing when the map is printed. This could be done by
supporting an overviewMapControlOptions parameter for specifying the
name of a CSS class to be applied to the control's DIV. If this were
done, a display: none; rule in a
All,
I'm experiencing an odd situation which I believe is unique to Safari
5.0.4 running on Mac OS X (in my case 10.6.6).
I have created a map containing draggable markers. When I zoom the map
in, then pan so that other markers should be exposed, they sometimes
do not appear. They usually reappea
I have a map with a fusion table layer and a bunch of polygons. The
polygons currently appear below the fusion layer. Is there any way to
get the polygons to be drawn so that they appear on top of the fusion
layer?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Goo
Jason:
See http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3114
Comment 9 there has an easy workaround for your problem until the V3.4
bug is fixed. Simply set the visible property of your labeled markers
explicitly when you create them.
Gary
On Mar 8, 5:26 pm, Jason Jonas wrote:
>
See marker "getVisible()" bug that has surfaced in the past day or so:
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3114
Gary
On Mar 1, 9:08 pm, "Chris Broadfoot (Google Employee)"
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently a new version of the Maps API went live. We have made improvements
> t
Maps%...>
> Thanks
> Ben
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Gary Little wrote:
> > I have a simple map which illustrates a problem in the current
> > iteration of V3.4:
>
> >http://www.luxcentral.com/bug/bug3.html
>
> > This map has a single
pi-v3/browse_thread/th...
> It seems the double click event has been changed at some place.
> Do you know if there exist a mean to use only version 3.3 in one code
> app?
>
> On Mar 2, 1:14 am, Gary Little wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have a simple map which illustrates a pro
I have a simple map which illustrates a problem in the current
iteration of V3.4:
http://www.luxcentral.com/bug/bug3.html
This map has a single marker with a dblclick handler attached. The
handler is supposed to center the map around the marker position and
zoom in one level.
All works well with
As of today (March 1), this problem seems to have been fixed. Yay!
Gary
On Feb 27, 10:00 am, Gary Little wrote:
> FYI, I have filed a bug report regarding the unexpected disappearance
> of markers when zooming in and out of a V3.4 Google map using Safari
> 5.0.3/Mac:
>
> http://
FYI, I have filed a bug report regarding the unexpected disappearance
of markers when zooming in and out of a V3.4 Google map using Safari
5.0.3/Mac:
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3076
The problem does not seem to occur with other browsers or other
versions of the Map
Chris,
I have filed a formal bug report concerning my "disappearing marker"
issue (on Safari 5.0.3/Mac) that was first observed when V3.4 came out
a couple of weeks ago.
See:
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3076
Gary
On Feb 22, 4:09 pm, "Chris Broadfoot (Google Emplo
Sascha,
I think you will have to do what Tim did in his sample code up above.
i.e., create a duplicate set of markers to add to the custom Street
View.
Gary
On Feb 20, 1:48 am, archinform wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> have a similar problem (posted
> onhttp://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-ap
For creating labels that are *not* associated with a marker, you can
use InfoBox, also in the Google Maps Utility Library:
http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/infobox/
Gary
On Feb 20, 1:07 am, Martin Matysiak wrote:
> Is your fixed location associated with a marker? T
Tim & I have been communicating directly about this. I will summarize
the resolution here so that others may benefit.
First of all, the InfoBox utility class ( see
http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/infobox/
) does work with Street View panoramas. In other words, you ca
version to 3.3, it works as expected.
Gary
On Feb 16, 2011, at 22:30 :24, Gary Little wrote:
> Chris,
>
> No errors in the console. I'm running Mac OS X 10.6.6 with Safari 5.0.3
> (6533.19.4) on a MacBook Pro.
>
> The markers disappear for the top 4 zoom levels.
>
&g
).
Gary
On Feb 16, 2011, at 22:20 :11, Chris Broadfoot wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Gary Little wrote:
> Note: The problem regarding the disappearing markers was observed with
> Safari/Mac. It did not occur with Firefox/Mac or Chrome/Mac.
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> I can&#
Note: The problem regarding the disappearing markers was observed with
Safari/Mac. It did not occur with Firefox/Mac or Chrome/Mac.
On Feb 16, 9:43 pm, Gary Little wrote:
> Tonight I've noticed that markers on my map disappear at high zoom
> levels; this seems to have just starte
Tonight I've noticed that markers on my map disappear at high zoom
levels; this seems to have just started happening today for no
apparent reason. The markers do not disappear if I set the version to
3.3
http://map.garylittle.ca/
Gary
On Feb 16, 10:00 am, Mike Dolbow wrote:
> Not sure how to lo
tation/javascript/reference.h...
> )
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Marc
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Gary Little wrote:
> > It would be instructive to know how Google gets markers to appear
> > above the street view pane. If that is understood it might giv
It would be instructive to know how Google gets markers to appear
above the street view pane. If that is understood it might give
insight into how to force something in the floatPane (i.e., an infobox
or infowindow) to appear above the street view as well.
On Feb 14, 9:34 am, Tim Blackburn wrot
I wrote this library, so I should be able to help... but I do not have
a system running MSIE 6. Just so you know, Google Maps API V3 no
longer supports MSIE 6, see
http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=16532
Doing a quick search of the web I note there are many zindexing bugs
If you're trying to add a label to any Marker, you can use the
MarkerWithLabel class:
http://google-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/tags/markerwithlabel/
Gary
On Dec 27, 10:03 pm, Mark Adler wrote:
> If anyone is interested, a program is linked here that reads a png
> image with an a
for is to tell a user to press Esc then immediately release
the mouse button.
Gary
On Dec 20, 7:01 pm, "geocode...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> On Dec 20, 9:55 pm, Gary Little wrote:
>
> > If you start dragging a marker, is there any way to cancel the drag so
> > that the mark
If you start dragging a marker, is there any way to cancel the drag so
that the marker returns to its original position? I thought that
pressing Esc might work... but it does not.
Gary
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" g
Gary
On Dec 7, 9:07 am, Gary Little wrote:
> Chris,
>
> But you can't determine the state of raiseOnDrag programmatically as
> you can many other Marker parameters.
>
> For example, in a class like MarkerWithLabel any drag that begins in
> the label portion needs to
Chris,
But you can't determine the state of raiseOnDrag programmatically as
you can many other Marker parameters.
For example, in a class like MarkerWithLabel any drag that begins in
the label portion needs to know whether the label is supposed to be
raised to keep it in sync with the marker port
AISEOFFSET constant, though.
Gary
On Dec 6, 1:59 pm, Gary Little wrote:
> Regarding the new "raiseOnDrag" feature:
>
> It would be useful to have a getRaiseOnDrag() method (for Marker
> class) for determining whether this feature is on or off. This would
> allow a custom
Regarding the new "raiseOnDrag" feature:
It would be useful to have a getRaiseOnDrag() method (for Marker
class) for determining whether this feature is on or off. This would
allow a custom class such as MarkerWithLabel (see ) to
raise the label associated with the marker only if raiseOnDrag is
tr
Chad,
Very clever! I hope Google never changes the URLs of its standard UI
GIF/JPEG/PNG files.
Gary
On Dec 3, 6:04 am, Chad Killingsworth
wrote:
> You sure about
> that?http://search.missouristate.edu/map/mobile/examples/removeclose.htm
>
> This technique won't work in Internet Explorer 7 or b
Malcolm,
Here's a piece of code derived from from my MarkerWithLabel class that
shows what you have to do:
function setLabelZIndex( labeldiv, marker ) {
var zAdjust = 1; // or -1 if you want the label in the background
if (typeof marker.getZIndex() === "undefined") {
labeldiv.style.zIndex
lygon.
>
> All these end up with pretty much the same results as before (the
> first 2 labels).
>
> - ping
>
> On Dec 1, 6:58 am, Gary Little wrote:
>
>
>
> > In your V3 example, because you've set InfoBox's
> > enableEventPropagation propert
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
