On the subject of new golf, I wonder if you golfers all know about
http://codegolf.com?
The rules are not quite the same as traditional Perl golf: the most
important difference is that the whole of the shebang line counts
towards the size, which effectively penalises the use of switches by
seven s
It seems to me that some of the solutions are not quite correct, failing the
test case:
MD plus I
which should produce the answer MDI.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that the shortest solutions
of szery, Sec and Jasper all fail this test case.
Falling back one stroke from 4e3 to
On 1/4/07, Andrew Savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems to me that some of the solutions are not quite correct, failing the
test case:
MD plus I
which should produce the answer MDI.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that the shortest solutions
of szery, Sec and Jasper all fail
Oh,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 10:44 +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
> It seems to me that some of the solutions are not quite correct, failing the
> test case:
>
> MD plus I
Well. Thats definitely bad. I gather that is what I get for taking other
peoples ideas from the web :-)
Ok, count me as
roma
--- Stefan `Sec` Zehl (principal taunter of `/anick) wrote:
> Ok, count me as
>
> romancalc.pl: 120.51 strokes (ok), md5=82eb4544217b1d7054bb90e9c75e3d27
Woohoo! Just two more diabolical test cases and I'll have caught the
elusive Sec. ;-)
You might call this "golfing the post mortem" ... speak
