might as well just code in assembly.
Different languages have different strengths and
weaknesses inherent in their design. Perl's regexps
are one of it's strongest points, and failing to
utilize that to its proper extent simply renders this
comparison useless. Same thing can be said of all
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:52:30PM -0700, Phil Carmody wrote:
> --- Ala Qumsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/bench/regexmatch/regexmatch.perl
> > > ?
> >
> > I couldn't understand what's the purpose of
test, each program should be implemented in the same way."
>
> http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/method.shtml#sameway
>
> Tests That Call For Implementations To Be Written The Same Way
>
> For some tests, I will specify that they be written using the same logic
> an
--- Ala Qumsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/bench/regexmatch/regexmatch.perl
> > ?
>
> I couldn't understand what's the purpose of the
> shootout? Performance? Character count?
Their purpose was performance. Perl was a bit
--- Phil Carmody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do any of you gurus have anything to say about the
> regexp shootout at:
>
>
http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/bench/regexmatch/
> including the perl contender:
>
>
http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/bench/regexm
Do any of you gurus have anything to say about the regexp shootout at:
http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/bench/regexmatch/
including the perl contender:
http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/bench/regexmatch/regexmatch.perl
?
Phil
=
Given that Dubya has control of a such vast arsenal
