On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
> Does that make sense?
Perversely, it does. :) Thank for you and the others to shed light
on this most interesting feature.
And to remember the lesson, what is better than to convert
it into a yaph?
Joy,
`/an
> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:28:36 +0100
> From: Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> These are two sides of the same coin, and not really very surprising,
> when you think about how modifying a key potentially means moving it
> to a new hash bucket.
That would be ugly. During the tournament, I di
> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:00:41 -0400
> From: Yanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:48:54PM -0400, Karger, Amir wrote:
> % perl -wle '@a=qw(e d c b a); for(map $_, @a){s/./uc($&)/e};print @a'
> edcba
>
> BUT
>
> % perl -wle '@a=qw(e d c b a); for(grep $_, @a){s/./uc(
> Date: 11 Apr 2002 14:22:22 -
> From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:10:27 +0200
> > From: Eugene van der Pijll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > No, values are modified, keys are not. But that's not so strange: hash
> > values are scalars; hash keys are s
Yanick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:04:22AM -0400, Karger, Amir wrote:
> > I get the same result as you (aBcD) when I run 5.6.1 on
> > solaris. So it looks like the aliasing mechanism switched from
> > 5.004 to 5.6.1.
>
> I get the same behavior:
>
> $ perl -v
>
> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:10:27 +0200
> From: Eugene van der Pijll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No, values are modified, keys are not. But that's not so strange: hash
> values are scalars; hash keys are strings:
>
> $ perl -le'$a{[1,2,3]} = [4,5,6]; print "$_: @$_" for %a'
> ARRAY(0x140001ad0):
> AR
En op 11 april 2002 sprak Yanick:
> $ perl -v
> This is perl, v5.6.1 built for i386-linux
> $ perl -le'%a = qw/ a b c d/; s/./uc$&/e for %a; print %a'
> aBcD
>
> And this one really takes the cake. Keys are modified,
> but not values... But wait! There is more!
No, values are modified, key
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:04:22AM -0400, Karger, Amir wrote:
> I get the same result as you (aBcD) when I run 5.6.1 on solaris. So it looks
> like the aliasing mechanism switched from 5.004 to 5.6.1.
I get the same behavior:
$ perl -v
This is perl, v5.6.1 built for i386-linux
$ perl -le
3 AM
> To: Karger, Amir
> Subject: Re: for(sort@a){...} affects @a
>
>
> Hello Amir!
>
> On 10 Apr 2002, you wrote in perl.golf:
>
> > Some more data?
> >
> >>perl -wle '%a=qw(a b c d); for(%a){s/./uc$&/e};print %a'
> > abcd
>
>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:48:54PM -0400, Karger, Amir wrote:
> In fact, it's not just sort:
>
> >perl -wle '@a=qw(e d c b a); for(reverse @a){s/./uc($&)/e};print @a'
> EDCBA
Egad! But:
% perl -wle '@a=qw(e d c b a); for(map $_, @a){s/./uc($&)/e};print @a'
edcba
BUT
% perl -wl
10 matches
Mail list logo
