Hello Danny!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Rathjens) wrote:
> Jasper McCrea wrote:
>>>Easy one ("Ordered fractions") will be finished on 2002-09-19 10:00:00 UTC
>> I think we should have an explanation of your 71.
>
> He encoded the whole list of answers like so:
> then he just loops through that lis
He encoded the whole list of answers like so:
1/9 -> 91
chr 91 == "["
so "[" stands for 1/9
then he just loops through that list of chars
if the ordinal value of the char starts with a number less than or equal
to the commandline arg
then he undoes the encoding the rest of the way by printing
the
Mtv Europe wrote:
>
> Hello All!
>
> Two new minigolfs are available at http://terje.dev.webon.net/golf/
>
> Easy one ("Ordered fractions") will be finished on 2002-09-19 10:00:00 UTC
> and hard one ("Forth") on 2002-09-24 10:00:00 UTC.
I think we should have an explanation of your 71.
Jaspe
En op 18 september 2002 sprak Mtv Europe:
> So with considerable help from you and Greg Allen we expanded testsuit
> to version 6 and sligtly updated the rules.
>
> Players, please retest your solutions.
No, please, I don't want to!
> The most important clarification is concerned to strict defi
Hello Julien!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julien Quint) wrote:
> which should output 5. This caught a few mistakes in my code that the
> testset did not cover; also, it makes my 148 solution a 154
> unfortunately...
Don't worry, i found few bugs in my code too. And albeit that was
different bugs, i'm at
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 11:21:29AM -, Mtv Europe wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> Two new minigolfs are available at http://terje.dev.webon.net/golf/
>
> Easy one ("Ordered fractions") will be finished on 2002-09-19 10:00:00 UTC
> and hard one ("Forth") on 2002-09-24 10:00:00 UTC.
>
> Players are we
