On Sunday 11 February 2007 14:17, Andrew Savige wrote:
> `/anick wrote:
> > Ooooh... A Roman-to-decimal rehash of the Fonality tournament.
> > Aah.. Emm... Do you mind if we pursue this conversation later on?
> > I suddenly remember I have things to do...
>
> Thanks `/ for bringing that to my atten
`/anick wrote:
> Ooooh... A Roman-to-decimal rehash of the Fonality tournament.
> Aah.. Emm... Do you mind if we pursue this conversation later on?
> I suddenly remember I have things to do...
Thanks `/ for bringing that to my attention. I need another golf game
like a hole in the head. ;-) As you
On Saturday 03 February 2007 21:22, Andrew Savige wrote:
> --- ô Great Ton wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >
> > "Robin Houston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On the subject of new golf, I wonder if you golfers all know about
> >> http://codegolf.com?
> >>
> >> The rules are no
--- ô Great Ton wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Robin Houston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On the subject of new golf, I wonder if you golfers all know about
>> http://codegolf.com?
>>
>> The rules are not quite the same as traditional Perl golf: the most
>> important differen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Cutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was just wondering, reading all your talk about your solutions to the
> fonality golf, I would assume that everyone converted in arabic,
> calculated and then converted back to roman. When I first had a look at
>
--- Jasper wrote:
> p.s.
> for($f=12;$f-->0;){
> surely
> for($f=12;--$f;){
> ?
p.p.s. Mr Magoo. I think you meant for($f=12;$f--;)
For cheap thrills, I fixed a few more Magoos, whittling dcutter's 247 to 237:
#!perl -aln
@a=(IV,IX,XL,XC,CD,CM,M,D,C,L,X,V);@b=(I,VI,X,LX,C,DC,DD,CC,LL,XX,VV,II);s
On 1/17/07, Daniel Cutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was just wondering, reading all your talk about your solutions to the
fonality golf, I would assume that everyone converted in arabic,
calculated and then converted back to roman. When I first had a look at
the problem I thought that that wou
I was just wondering, reading all your talk about your solutions to the
fonality golf, I would assume that everyone converted in arabic,
calculated and then converted back to roman. When I first had a look at
the problem I thought that that would be the obvious way to do it. At
the time I thoug
> My first thought was HART: Hospelian Arabic to Roman Transform.
>Remembering this old "ton is an alien" thread, I now propose "Earthman":
Eye-popping Alien Roman Ton Hospelian Magical Algorithm for Numerals
> If you can think of a better name, please let us know. :-)
I don't know of any val
On Sunday 14 January 2007 11:31, Ton Hospel wrote:
> > Super trivial Magoo on yanicks solution, good for one T-shirt:
> >
> > =~/$&/ can be written as =~$&
>
> Less Magoo:
>
> #!perl -lp040
> $s=/m/
> if/u/;($y=I1V5X10L50C100D500M1000IV4IX9XL40XC90CD400CM900)=~chop,$t+=$s^"$;
>">($;=$')?-$;:$;while
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ton Hospel) writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Andrew Savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can anyone else see anything Mr Magoo-like in m.wrenn's or
>> `/anick's solutions? Just to rub it in, you see. :-)
>>
> Super trivial
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andrew Savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anyone else see anything Mr Magoo-like in m.wrenn's or
> `/anick's solutions? Just to rub it in, you see. :-)
>
Super trivial Magoo on yanicks solution, good for one T-shirt:
=~/$&/ can be written as =~$&
On Saturday 13 January 2007 21:20, Andrew Savige wrote:
> Can anyone else see anything Mr Magoo-like in m.wrenn's or
> `/anick's solutions? Just to rub it in, you see. :-)
You, my friend, are a very evil, very cruel man.
> I had toyed with Util's approach during
> the game, but kept flog
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ton Hospel) writes:
> #!perl -pl
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> s!.!y$IVCXL91-I0$XLMCDXVIII$dfor$X[$_].=4x$&%1859^7!eg,!y/m/-/..3999;s/\w+/+$Y{$&}/g;$_=$X[eval]
>
> (114.54)
Exactly the same thing, but taking a bit more care with the tie breaker
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ton Hospel) writes:
> The most obvious target is to get rid of the 0:
> #!perl -pl
> s!.!y$IVCXL91-I0$XLMCDXVIII$dfor$X[$_].=4x$&%1859^7!egfor!y/m/-/..3999;@[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]@X;s/\w+/+$Y{$&}/g;$_=$X[eval]
>
> (115.54)
Also use map to ge
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andrew Savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- Michael Wrenn wrote:
>> ... An extremely obvious 2 stroker ...
>
> I've cast my eye over your and `/anick's solutions looking for
> any more "obvious 2 strokers". Alas, I couldn't find one in
> `/anick's master
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Stephen Turner wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2002, Ton Hospel wrote:
>>
>> Jerome Quelin writes:
>>>
>>> I begin to think that Ton is an alien. This makes me wonder: has anyone
>>> seen Ton in real life? ;)
>>>
>> I have.
>
> That's just what an alien _would_ say.
>
> --
> Stephen Turn
--- Michael Wrenn wrote:
> ... An extremely obvious 2 stroker ...
I've cast my eye over your and `/anick's solutions looking for
any more "obvious 2 strokers". Alas, I couldn't find one in
`/anick's masterwork, but I did find another Mr Magoo-esque
2 stroker in your 169.51, namely changing:
qw(
--- Ton Hospel wrote:
> I think you should also explain how constructing the table
> backwards (from 3999 to 1) allows you to put the $$$_=$_
> *inside* the s///eg, since that way the wrong entries for
> the partial roman strings during buildup get fixed later on.
> And maybe also why the range can
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andrew Savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please let me know if you see something in the report that
> makes you pull a face.
>
I think you should also explain how constructing the table
backwards (from 3999 to 1) allows you to put the $$$_=$_
*inside* the
I've done a post mortem report on the Fonality tournament at:
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=594299
Unfortunately, I had to remove the lovely little orange picture
of (-ugene because I seem to have hit the size limit of a Perl
Monks meditation. :-(
The little pink picture of `/anick remains,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andrew Savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You might call this "golfing the post mortem" ... speaking of which,
> I bet Ton is still searching for that elusive 98. :-)
>
Nah, I'm not. I'm reasonably confident that the magic formula is
optimal for a one shot
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Robin Houston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the subject of new golf, I wonder if you golfers all know about
> http://codegolf.com?
>
> The rules are not quite the same as traditional Perl golf: the most
> important difference is that the whole of the s
--- /-\ndrew Savige wrote:
> It seems to me that some of the solutions are not quite correct, failing the
> test case:
>
> MD plus I
>
> which should produce the answer MDI.
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that the shortest solutions
> of szery, Sec and Jasper all fail this tes
--- Stefan `Sec` Zehl (principal taunter of `/anick) wrote:
> Ok, count me as
>
> romancalc.pl: 120.51 strokes (ok), md5=82eb4544217b1d7054bb90e9c75e3d27
Woohoo! Just two more diabolical test cases and I'll have caught the
elusive Sec. ;-)
You might call this "golfing the post mortem" ... speak
Oh,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 10:44 +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
> It seems to me that some of the solutions are not quite correct, failing the
> test case:
>
> MD plus I
Well. Thats definitely bad. I gather that is what I get for taking other
peoples ideas from the web :-)
Ok, count me as
roma
On 1/4/07, Andrew Savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems to me that some of the solutions are not quite correct, failing the
test case:
MD plus I
which should produce the answer MDI.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that the shortest solutions
of szery, Sec and Jasper all fail
It seems to me that some of the solutions are not quite correct, failing the
test case:
MD plus I
which should produce the answer MDI.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that the shortest solutions
of szery, Sec and Jasper all fail this test case.
Falling back one stroke from 4e3 to
On the subject of new golf, I wonder if you golfers all know about
http://codegolf.com?
The rules are not quite the same as traditional Perl golf: the most
important difference is that the whole of the shebang line counts
towards the size, which effectively penalises the use of switches by
seven s
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 22:32, Michael Wrenn wrote:
> Yanick Champoux wrote:
> > Stefan `Sec` Zehl said:
> >> No. Look at \'anick for example (poor \'anick :)
>
> May I be the first to second that!
>
> poor, poor \'anick!
Now, now, now. Isn't there some tacit rule in the gentlemen's cod
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 05:42, Andrew Savige wrote:
> Yes, doing battle with `/anick is perhaps the pinnacle of any golfer's
> career.
Flattering, but I have to disagree. It's akin to say that the most
breath-taking act at the circus is the clown intermission. But still, I like
to
--- Michael Wrenn wrote:
> OK! Here's what happened to me ... I went out to get some dinner and
> returned to check on my solid 20th Place (securing a prized
> Fonality/trixbox T-shirt) ... when what to my wondering eyes should
> appear, but \'anick the Canuck who was now TWO STROKES CLEAR! I C
Michael, what an amazing story. I laughed, I cried, I moved you back
down to 21. Just kidding!
Thank you all for playing! It was an awesome golf! Hope to join in on
the next public golf.
ps, winners will be contacted shortly (or already have been) to receive
their prizes!
Michael Wrenn wro
Yanick Champoux wrote:
Stefan `Sec` Zehl said:
No. Look at \'anick for example (poor \'anick :)
May I be the first to second that!
poor, poor \'anick!
He sets a fine example, doesn't he!
Yeah. Whoever wrote that "the one who doesn't learn from history is
condemned to repeat i
Le mardi 02 janvier 2007 à 10:13, Jasper écrivait:
> Congratulations, Ton.
>
> As if the outcome was ever in doubt.. :D
In the case where one of the players is actually hired by Fonality,
I wonder if s/he'll be authorized to write the same kind of code in
their production systems as the one they
Stefan `Sec` Zehl said:
>
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:13 +, Jasper wrote:
>> Now, as an afterthought, am I the only person to have missed the
>> perlgolf history book, and the only person who submitted a score that
>> didn't have something like : $;.=5x$_*8%29628
>
> No. Look at \'anick for ex
En op 18 maart 2002 sprak Andrew Savige:
> Allocating prize money for each of the 5 Perl Golf tournaments
> at $4 million per tournament, according to the formula used by
> the US PGA, produces the following tables.
That figure turns out to have been a bit optimistic...
En op 02 januari 2007 spra
Jasper wrote:
> Can someone send me a link? Terje's old link has expired, and there
> doesn't seem to be an equivalent on his currently
> extant-but-hibernating minigolf site.
http://terje2.frox25.no-ip.org/~golf-info/Book.html
It's linked on http://perlgolf.sourceforge.net/ and google finds it
On 1/2/07, Andrew Savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
effort. Sorry 'bout that, Jasper. It never occurred, not in my
wildest dreams that you'd never heard of mtve's big book of golf!
Can someone send me a link? Terje's old link has expired, and there
doesn't seem to be an equivalent on his curre
--- Jasper wrote:
> Congratulations, Ton.
Yep, I echo Jasper's congratulations Ton. What remains freakish is
the speed at which Ton posts a great score.
I'd also like to thank Samy. Having refereed similar sized tournaments
on my own, I know how exhausting and time consuming it is. Thanks Samy!
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:13 +, Jasper wrote:
> Now, as an afterthought, am I the only person to have missed the
> perlgolf history book, and the only person who submitted a score that
> didn't have something like : $;.=5x$_*8%29628
No. Look at \'anick for example (poor \'anick :)
I had onc
Congratulations, Ton.
As if the outcome was ever in doubt.. :D
Now, as an afterthought, am I the only person to have missed the
perlgolf history book, and the only person who submitted a score that
didn't have something like : $;.=5x$_*8%29628
:)
I had a good time doing it, though. Thanks, Sam
ds
Terje K
- Original Message -
From: Michael W Thelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:31:56 -0600
To: Terje Kristensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: New golf "Add 11"
> * Terje Kristensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-14 13:33]:
> > A n
* Terje Kristensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-14 13:33]:
> A new minigolf "Add 11" has started today.
> url : http://terje.dev.webon.net/golf/?10
How is the tiebreaker calculated?
-- Mike
--
Michael W. Thelen
eval unpack u,'M*"1C/22\A+48O82UZ+SME=F%L*"1C+B(G='.
'2HGM+"
44 matches
Mail list logo
