This is more of a request for comments and not a complete proposal. I will try
to keep this short(ish) and simple.
Note that the `else` I will write about is not to be confused with the usual
`else` used with `if`. It is an `else` in a slightly different context.
`else` is basically an `if` wit
Brian, you pointed out some important issues I was concerned about. Go does
not and should not have any magic, so that is definitely a big problem. I
also agree with you, that limiting the available expression syntax is not
great and that else catch could make code non-obvious.
Regarding doing
> '?' is just a symbol that can be replaced by some another one
> On Saturday, February 15, 2020 at 6:06:39 PM UTC-5, teknoslo wrote:
>>
>> This is more of a request for comments and not a complete proposal. I will
>> try
>> to keep this short(ish) and sim
I am not obsessed with try catch, I do not even like it. And I
definitely do not want to copy it or have it in Go. As I said in the post,
I like to *read* else catch with an implicit try before the function call
and therefore named it else catch. And I think the else catch is not like
try catch
